Presto

Issue: 1925 2037

August 8, 1925.
PRESTO
strong drink. People don't usually get drunk on
mild drinks like wine and beer.
Significantly enough, under the dry act, as you
know, the members of your own profession are al-
lowed the free use of wine, for "sacramental" pur-
poses.
I am just as much opposed to strong drink as you
can possibly be, and it is the strong drink that is
working such great harm to the youths of this
country.
Between the amendment and the laws you favor
all America is being driven to strong drink. I don't
want the saloons back, but, as I have said before, the
cabarets and roadhouses are greater breeders, along
with joy riding and petting parties, of crime and vice
than the saloon ever thought of being, and put it
down for a fact that there are almost as many
cabarets in Chicago as there were saloons before the
eighteenth amendment came into force, and almost
every one of these cabarets and these roadhouses is
selling strong drink to all comers, and the enforce-
ment officers for a price wink the eye, hold out the
hand, and look the other way at the violations going
on.
I believe that members of your "crowd" or "gang"
are awaking to the fact that the amendment and laws
you favor cannot be enforced, and that the whole
business is an absolute farce. The enforcement offi-
cers announce every few days that they have seized
a large quantity of liquor and found a still, but do
you know what they do with that liquor? I have
been told by several that most of that liquor is sold
to bootleggers and they in turn sell it to the public.
I heard of a case recently where a man's premises
sere raided, in a certain nearby town, and two gallons
)f whisky were seized. The man was taken to court
ind the whisky presented in evidence. The man was
|fined a round sum, and the whisky confiscated. After
had gone his way, having paid the fine, the judge
remarked to the sheriff who made the arrest that it
was a pity such excellent liquor should go to waste.
The sheriff warmly agreed, and so they divided it be-
tween them in privacy and took it home.
Unenforceable Laws.
If things go along as they have been doing lately,
vhat is there in life that cheap politicians won't seek
|o control in the way of law, enacting everything
that they should not enact, governing the taste and
ronduct of humanity? Meanwhile, murder still goes
m, so does crime, in spite of all the laws since his-
ory began. I repeat that you can't make people
>ood or honest by law. This is certainly true as to
aws like prohibition laws, which are utterly and ab-
;olutely unenforceable, always have been and always
vill be.
I know that all the recent amendments and laws
rhich your radicals and so-called progressives favor
re retrogressive rather than progressive; they are
ad, and decidedly not good.
I want to tell you of an experience that I recently
ad in New York, Boston, Washington and here in
Chicago. My wife and daughter landed from Europe
n July 10, and I stopped in hotels in the four cities
tamed, and in every one of them I was approached
>y bootleggers wishing to supply me with strong
rink. In my hotel in New York, no less than five
r six different ones were willing to supply all the
trong drink I might have wanted. I assure you that,
k'hile I was tempted, I did not drink.
How you can favor a law which furthers the very
vil that you condemn, by making it impossible to
et a mild drink and forcing those who think they
mst drink or think it is smart to drink, as the young
eople do and as the fashionable people to whom you
efer do, to drink rank poison, is more than I can
ossibly understand as coming from one of the
lergy.
1 again remind you of the Scripture which reads:
Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging, and who-
mever is deceived thereby is not wise."
I favor temperance in everything. I don't want to
ee intolerance drive us back again to the days of the
nquisition.
Don't you know (I do) that almost all the legis-
Ltors who make these laws and pass these amend-
lents break the very laws they make? If you don't
now, I will tell you, that a very great mapority of
le lawmakers and the enforcement officers are drink-
"s of strong drink. They violate the laws they make
lemselves. They are very, very wet in private and
lly dry in public.
I will enclose with this a clipping, "From One of
hem," signed "A Flapper." This, too, appeared in
le Tribune, which you called "wet" and a "garbler"
itil your recent letter of thanks to them for pub-
shing your letter.
This "Flapper" seems to be a member of my
fang." At all events, she says that I know the
cts, and intimates that you don't know what you are
Iking about.
The Decorah Dinner.
I am enclosing also the menu of the dinner at
ecorah, in which you will see that you are listed as
pe of the speakers, just following a cousin of mine,
"reverend" also, who has been a lecturer for twenty-
le years, a la Burton Holmes, and for fifteen or
^enty years before that was pastor of various
lurches.
I read to him the last two of our letters, and he is
sapporter of myself in some things and of yourself
others. He is "on the fence," as they say, and I
>n't know where to class him, as to whether he is a
ember of your "gang" or of mine. There are a lot
people that way. Several of them were at this
nner.
I wish you might have been there and have en-
jhtened us on this subject, and, as I shall be here
I
19
in Chicago for the next ten days before starting for
my home in California via the Yellowstone Park, I
shall be glad to have a call from you at your con-
venience, when we can discuss these matters, and go
on with friendly argument about this subject, but I
really would like to have the judge and jury to make
the decision in the matter as to whether your "gang"
or my own is in the right. And I should like to have
the judge and the members of the jury really know
what is going on, for you seem either not to know
the truth or to ignore it.
I wish you would carefully read the remarks at
this Decorah dinner made by Mr. Biermann, editor
of the Decorah Journal, and by Dr. F. W. Conover,
who is Mayor of Decorah. Note especially the two
cases he spoke of recently before him. Also please
do read the current number of the North American
Review. These things may enlighten you. I hope
you will, for you seem to be in the dark about many
things.
Some Statistics.
I hope also you will especially note what Oscar
Wolff says about the increase of deaths here in Chi-
cago from alcoholism. Vile, .strong stuff is being
taken by those who must have it until this year shows
that there are five times as many deaths from al-
coholism as there were before. I also wish you
would elucidate, if you can, how there was five times
as much strong drink taken before prohibition as
there is now. Then they took a drink; now they
have to take a pint or a quart. Convince me, if you
can, that a drink is five times worse than a quart.
You and your "dry" disciples, as I have said be-
fore, are increasing crime, drunkenness, dope-taking,
insanity, death, and vice generally, as statistics prove.
The laws you and your "gang" favor are deadly in
every sense of the word.
I was surprised to be told by one of my guests and
speakers at Decorah—Miss Clara Rollins—that she
knew you and your brother in college. She was in-
deed surprised at your position, and seems to be one
of my "gang."
Yours very truly,
GEO. P. BENT.
P. S.—As yet I get no reply to mine of July 25.
Do you find it unanswerable?
BENT.
I never met Mr. Roloff, nor did I know of the
Illinois Social Hygiene League until this letter came
to me, nor did I know Mr. A. W. Yeater, of 1554
North Clark street, Chicago, from whose long eight-
page letter I make some extracts and enclose to you
herewith. [The letter, or extracts from it, appear
in the report of Mr. Bent's remarks at the Piano
Club Luncheon.—Ed. Presto.]
I hope you will carefully read and ponder upon
what Mr. Yeater and Mr. Roloff say.
Both these men seem to know what they are talk-
ing about, and, as I have said to you, I don't think
you know at all what you are talking about. You
have a theory, but if you will kindly investigate and
learn the situation and the real facts for yourself I
am certain that you will have a change of heart, and
will become as I have been, an advocate of temper-
ance and tolerance, not of prohibition and bigotry.
I sincerely hope, and if I were a religious man
would pray, that you may become a convert to and
advocate of the sentiments which I have and do not
fear to express to you or to any other person who
has an opposite idea.
I never was politic enough to be a politician. I
never could make votes as McKinley does, for you
say he knows how to talk in order to get votes. I
am more of the type of Grover Cleveland, who said
what he thought, regardless of consequences. He
said in one of his addresses, "It is not a theory but
a condition which confronts us." He was utterly and
absolutely honest and spoke out bravely and boldly
against the heresy of 16 to 1, which your friend
Bryan advocated; that is, I mean your friend Bryan
as to prohibition, but not your friend as to evolution.
Well All Don't Agree.
You will remember in one of my letters I said to
you that it was very good that there was not the
same thought among wise men as to everything,
which was shown by your agreeing with Bryan on
prohibition, but not on evolution. Even very great
and very wise men do disagree, and I think it is a
good thing for the world that this is so. What a
terrible, awful row there would be if all men loved
one particular woman! Can you imagine such a
condition?
Mr. Harry F. Atwood spoke before the Chicago
Piano Club, an organization having over 400 mem-
bers, today at luncheon, and at the close of his re-
ENCLOSURES AND DISCLOSURES.
marks the president of the organization, Mr.
Schoenwald, told a story of a man who appeared be-
Mr. Bent Draws Attention to Expert Testimony as fore a judge in the night court, with two automobile
cushions under his arms, and when the judge asked
to Effects of Dry Law.
him what he was there for and what he wanted done
for him, he replied that someone had stolen his auto-
Chicago, August 3, 1925.
mobile while he was busy outside in the bushes!
Rev. Irving E. Putnam,
He was evidently filled to the full with "strong
306 Richards St,
drink,"
and doubtless his companion was also—•
Joliet, 111.
which
the
Bible says "is raging."
My Dear Sir: Since I wrote you yesterday I
In the words of the Scriptures, Selah, until you
opened and read some of the many letters I found write
me again.
awaiting me here in approval of my sentiments. A
Very truly yours,
few sided with you, but the vote is decidedly against
GEO. P. BENT.
you.
P. S.—I enclose also copy of a letter to Mr. M. T.
I wish to call your attention to the enclosures, that
one entitled "Dry Era Run Drives Many Women Grattan, of Decorah, la., and call your attention par-
Mad." Please note especially what is said in that ticularly to the last two paragraphs but one.
item under the title, "Moral Letdown," which reads
as follows:
AT PIANO CLUB LUNCHEON.
"But there is a letdown in moral standards in this
At the conclusion of the luncheon of the Piano
country, and in my opinion the cause of it all is—pro-
Club, at Illinois Athletic Club, Chicago, Monday,
hibition.
"At the Psychophatic Hospital I treat hundreds of
Aug. 3, the president presented Mr. Bent who, after
women who come from good homes, who are persons of
introductory remarks in which the Putnam corres-
education and refinement.
"These women, normally self-contained, lose all control
of themselves when they start to drink, and become mad pondence was referred to and also a similar "trouble"
with a Rev. Dr. Dyer, of California, spoke in effect
creatures for the time being.
"I see young girls, too—children scarcely out of the as follows:
schoolroom—victims of nervous jags, who carry their
pocket flasks as naturally as their powder puffs."
When I reached Chicago I received an eight-page
Also note the cartoon in the Chicago Tribune of letter from Mr. A. W. Yeater, 1554 North Clark
today headed: "Our National Week-End Sprees," street, Chicago, dated July 24. He must have seen
also "An Old Story," also "The Old Days," also what has appeared in the Chicago Tribune about the
dinner I gave June 9 to some of my oldest friends
"Some Are with Us."
I am going to send to M. A. Nupatree the corre- and the correspondence which has passed between
spondence between us, as it will appear in the Rev. Putnam and myself since, as it appeared in the
Decorah Republican, which is to be issued this week. Tribune. I quote from this long, very interesting
letter the beginning and closing of same:
From One of "The Gang."
I find that neither the Tribune nor Presto has as
yet printed your letter to me of July 22 and mine to
you of July 25, but those two letters will appear in
the Presto of this week, and I shall have sent on to
you copies of both these papers, so that you may see
that what you write to me is not garbled, but is
printed exactly as you write it.
I have not seen B. W.'s article, spoken of in "An
Old Story."
I also in this enclose a copy of a letter written
July 29, by Bernard C. Roloff, who is the executive
secretary of the Illinois Social Hygiene League.
He is one of my "gang" evidently, for in that letter
he says, in the last three paragraphs:
"There is no question but that most of the illicit sex
contacts that bring girls here for treatment are due to
liquor. Before prohibition this condition was rare. At
that time 90 per cent of the women who came here were
infected by their husbands and 90 per cent of the men
who came here were infected by prostitutes. Now 50
per cent of our women patients confess being infected by
'friends' and 70 per cent of the men to being infected by
women 'friends.' The venereal woman of today is the
'cheating' wife, the 'loose' widow and the 'wild' flapper.
These are competing so violently with the old bawdy
house prostitutes that the latter are lost in the shuttle.
"This peculiar situation is directly due to the change
in the drinking: situation.
"Please understand I have no axe to grind in this con-
troversy, but I could not help but give credit where
credit was due. This League does not moralize. It is
not a reform agency such as Brother Putnam makes
himself to be. The fighting we have to do is against the
distinctly recognized evil which we can only reach by
commonsense
methods—prophylaxis—education—treat-
ment."
"Dear Mr. Bent: It is very unfortunate that we have
not more public-spirited men with sufficient backbone to
defy the feminists (and their 'inspired by women' male
co-workers and hirelings) who are now running (and
ruining) our country. Existing conditions were well
stated by Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, when he said:
" 'The America-n people must learn to think of these
things, and to give up that unwillingness, which seems
so characteristic, to discuss or to deal with the disputed
and the disagreeable. We have almost gotten to a point
where public men and those who should be leaders of
opinion hesitate to speak until they know what others
are likely to say, and how what they say will probably
be received by the press and the public. There are not
so many as there should be who are willing to take the
risk of being unpopular for the sake of being right.'
"President Coolidge has told the feminists and their
loyal servants, the preachers that 'the attempt to
dragoon the body when the need is to convince the soul
can end only in revolt,' but they are too wise, of course,
to pay any heed to his advice.
• * *
"I know what their answers will be, for I have put the
facts up to some of these sanctimonious and holier-than-
thou hypocrites who pose as the authorized representa-
tives and spokesmen of Almighty God and keepers of
the keys of the gates of heaven and hell. They will tell
you that something should be done, of course, but will
also tell you to 'let George do it,' as they are 'too busy.'
You could not get them to touch this subject if you pro-
vided them with asbestos gloves, or a pair of tongs a
yard long. They might lose some of their 'generous con-
tributors' by doing so.
Pretence of the "Posers."
"The stand on the subject of sexual morality that has
been taken by these posers, and by the feminists they
represent and serve, is the weakest spot in their armor,
and it is the spot we should attack if we want to dis-
credit them. They are very careful to avoid any public
discussion of this subject, and if you want to make them
squirm and run for cover, just try to force them to come
Enhanced content © 2008-2009 and presented by MBSI - The Musical Box Society International (www.mbsi.org) and the International Arcade Museum (www.arcade-museum.com).
All Rights Reserved. Digitized from the archives of the MBSI with support from NAMM - The International Music Products Association (www.namm.org).
Additional enhancement, optimization, and distribution by the International Arcade Museum. An extensive collection of Presto can be found online at http://www.arcade-museum.com/library/
20
August 8, 1925.
PRESTO
out in the open and uphold publicly the views they en-
dorse privately.
"If you and your friends want to have some real sport
with them, why not form a 'welfare' organization to ex-
pose and oppose the corrupt and corrupting modern sex
teachings, and ask these posers to denounce said teach-
ings, and the teachers, from their pulpits? Why not
ask them to uphold Miss Willard's view of 'ideal' sex
living and see what they say? You will get many a
good laugh out of the alibis and excuses they will offer,
and will get plenty of ammunition to use in discrediting
them as wise advisers and leaders, if you want to show
them up for the moral cowards and hypocrites they are.
"If you want it, I can furnish you with an abundance
of information regarding- the books containing these cor-
rupt and corrupting sex teachings and the people who
write, publish, recommend or circulate them. Some of
this information will greatly surprise you and your
friends, I know. One old ba.ttler who has been engaged
in reform work for over thirty years, trying to abolish
existing evils by more drastic law enforcement, was
astounded and dumbfounded by this information when it
was brought to his attention. He has tried to interest
deacons, ministers, bishops and others in the subject,
but 1 have not heard of their doing anything as yet.
"In my opinion they won't do anything until you. or
some other man with wealth and influence, gets after
them and demands that they state the reasons for their
apathy, indifference and inactivity.
His Fighting Qualities.
"One of these posers has gone out of his way te say
of you, your views and 'your crown': 'Such raving** as
this have but one reason behind them—namely, "I like
my liquor, ami I want my friends to have it; I do not
like to have to be known as a law breaker in order to
carry out my own desire." Your crowd should realize,
etc' I don't know anything about the fighting qualities
of other members of 'your crowd,' but your answer to
this poser's insulting letter most conclusively proves that
you are not going to tamely submit to being discredited
by him and his 'crowd.'
"My fighting ancestors were among the so-called
.'traitors to their king and country.' who fought for, won,
and passed on to their descendants the rights and privi-
leges the people of this 'pacifist' poser's caliber now want
to voluntarily surrender. I imagine you come of the
same old revolutionary stock, and respect for Good laws
because they are good, not all laws merely because they
are laws. I imagine you also request and honor good
women and girls because they are good, not all women
and girls merely because they are females.
"I hope you will pardon the length of this communi-
cation. This is a very large and very important subject,
and it is easier to write a book or shelf of books about
it than it is to write a short letter.
"Yours most sincerely,
"(Signed) A. W. YEATER."
After Drake Dinner.
Mr. Bent also reviewed the correspondence which
appears in these pages, concluding with the letter
from Mr. B. C. Roloff, extracts from which also
appear in a foregoing letter to the Rev. Putnam,
and concluding as follows:
"Let me add that the morning after the dinner in
the Drake, I was approached by a lady in the rotunda.
Evidently someone had pointed me out to her, for
she came up and shook my hand most cordially.
She didn't give her name, but she said: 'I want to
shake hands with a man who has got the courage at
least to stand up and tell what the Eighteenth
Amendment and the Volstead Act are doing to the
youth of this country.' Those are her very words.
It seems people are afraid to tell what they know.
I am not.
"I now have great pleasure in introducing my
friend, Mr. Harry F. Atwood, who spoke to us at
the dinner on June 9 at the Drake."
ADDRESS OF MR. HARRY F. ATWOOD.
I am sure it is a pleasure to meet the members of
the Piano Club. I have been going about the country
for something like seven years, talking almost daily
on the Constitution of the United States. My wife
says that I am getting to be a bore socially, because
I have to get on to this subject in some way wher-
ever I am. She said that if I kept on my friends
. would feel like the prisoner down in Texas who had
been convicted of murder and when brought into
court the judge said: "If you have anything to say
why sentence of death should not be pronounced
upon you, you have five minutes." The prisoner re-
plied: "I have nothing particular to say." Then a
man crowded to the bench and said: "Your Honor,
if there is no objection, I would like to utilize that
five minutes with a talk on the single tax." The
judge looked down at the prisoner and said: "Have
you any objection, sir?" He replied: "None what-
eevr, only I would like to be executed first."
(Laughter.)
Now, when you hear the average person talking
about the Constitution, he talks about the Declara-
tion of Independence and the Constitution as though
they were the same thing. Of course, they are just
as different as day and night. The Declaration of
Independence was written a year and a day after
Washington was sworn in as commander-in-chief of
the army, and while they talked about liberty or
death, they were careful not to get on the battlefield.
It simply contains phrases that have appeared in
political documents ever since government was dis-
cussed.
The Constitution, on the other hand, was a docu-
ment written by men who, after winning the Revo-
lutionary War, and for five years living under chaotic
conditions, sought by the lessons of history to work
out a plan of government.
Causes of Misunderstanding.
Another reason for the prevailing misunderstand-
ing is that 1 don't think there has ever been a good
definition of the Constitution. The dictionaries and
encyclopedias say the Constitution is the organic law,
which suggests the question, what is an inorganic
law? Or they say the Constitution is the fundamen-
tal law, which suggests the question, are the other
laws unfundamental?
I made a statement in Cleveland about four years
ago. I said: "1 will let you take an audience of a
hundred people, college presidents, superintendents
of schools, members of the bar, anyone you want; I
will make a speech of 40 minutes and I will make
twenty-five statements that are not true, and if any
one of the audience recognizes any one of the mis-
statements I will pay the cost of the dinner."
The assistant superintendent of schools came to my
office and said: "I have been wanting to see you a
long time. That statement you made in Cleveland
appeared in the paper."
If you take our Constitution, you will find it is
just this: It is a statement of purposes, followed by
a plan for setting up a mechanism to administer gov-
ernment in harmony with the purposes set forth.
A lot of people think of the Constitution as deter-
mining what is right and what is wrong. In the
original Constitution you won't find even a sugges-
tion of such a sort of thing.
The impression of the average person is that some
wonderful people several centuries ago came over
here, God-guided, as it were, with very high ideals
and wonderful aspirations for better things and be-
gan building very wisely day by day, until they
reared a great governmental structure.
Several years before the Constitution was written,
conditions were such that the mob drove our Con-
gress from Philadelphia into New Jersey, Shay's
rebellion assaulted the court houses in Massachusetts,
money was worth two and a half cents on the dollar,
we hadn't any credit anywhere, and trade was para-
lyzed.
Washington was getting to be an old man, and he
said in 1786. "Unless something is done, I see noth-
ing ahead but the black night of anarchy."
Under those conditions, these men met and wrote
the Constitution.
Rapid Restoration.
In three years all that was changed, we had orderly
government and our credit was firmly established.
People in all countries were asking, what happened
over there that brought that might change? After
the Constitution was adopted there were more inven-
tions given to the world in seventy-five years than
in all the thousands of years before.
It couldn't be that people became suddenly much
wiser, or gifted with more inventive ability. It
simply meant that under the Constitution there was
safety and the individual was made secure in the en-
joyment of his rewards for his inventions. We de-
veloped here a people of great initiative, and the Con-
stitution was responsible for all those things.
Any amendment would be proper that was de-
signed to change the mechanism of the Constitution.
Amendment 11 is a very proper amendment, because
it made it impossible for the people of one State to
sue another State, or for the people of another coun-
try to sue a State. All they had to do was to strike
out twelve words in Section 1 of the Judiciary. But
instead -of that, they put it on as an appendix.
I am one who after seven years' study feel it was
just as absurd to put on the first ten amendments to
the Constitution as it would be if you had a fine
automobile, ready to run, and someone came along
who didn't know anything about the making of it but
wanted to get some credit and suggested putting a
trailer on it with ten tin cans, and when the auto-
mobile went down the street the trailer and the ten
tin cans would get all the attention.
When people talk about the Constitution they
usually begin referring to the first ten amendments.
I could take any one of them and show that the
very thing suggested is as much better provided for
in the original Constitution, as a building erected on
cement pillars instead of on tooth-picks. Of course,
that statement would take a lot of time to develop.
Another thing they did that they were very posi-
tive about: they established a representative gov-
ernment. We have talked a great deal about de-
mocracy for ten years. The men who founded this
Republic knew the dangers of democracy and warned
us against them. They said, in Federalist No. 10:
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence
and contention. They have ever been found incom-
patible with personal security or the rights of prop-
erty, and have in general been as short in their lives
as violent in their deaths."
Much Talk, Little Action.
Now if we talked about throwing stones at this
window (indicating) but never did it, the window
would not suffer much. So we did a lot of loose
talking about rights and very little about duties and
responsibilities. But until twenty-five years ago we
never introduced any laws for direct action. About
that time we began nutting on laws for the initiaive,
referendum, recall, and recall of judicial decisions.
As soon as we got direct action, we began talking
about all these questions ourselves—things that we
didn't know anything about.
There isn't anything new about democracy. All
the democracies history knows of have had a stroke
of paralysis.
There never has been such an alarming change in
the history of any country as there has been here
the past twenty-five years in the lowering of public
morals.
Mr. Bent: What about electing senators direct?
Mr. Atwood: That is included in my statement.
The Senate, notwithstanding its shortcomings, was
regarded all over the world as the greatest delibera-
tive body in the world, and today, after twenty-five
years of this nonsense, a good many people think
it is a pretty good place to start a mental sanitarium.
The tendency in selecting public men during recent
years, instead of weighing them as you would an
architect, engineer, piano maker or anything of that
kind, has been to select people who are popular.
That is, we assume they are popular, although I don't
think any man ever lived, including Jesus Christ, who i
had followers who would follow him against their '
real convictions.
j
Since direct action has come upon us, demagogues J
have sprung up who have been all the time talking !
about the people. In every interview they talk J
about their love for the people and their intention to :
guard the people. They don't know anything about :
fundamental propositions.
,
The Constitution says: "We guarantee to every
State a republican form of government." When they
provided for submitting the Constitution to the States,
they said: "When nine States in convention ratify
this Constitution," and in providing for amendments,
they said: "When three-quarters of the State legis-
latures ratify it."
The Referendum.
In other words, you will not find the faintest hint)
of democracy in the original Constitution. No one
would think of having a referendum for a surgical
operation.
There is nothing new in it. It was the way Christ
was tried. Outside of the Constitution there is
nothing that throws so much light on this question
as the trial of Christ. He was out on the street, an j
innocent man doing good. A mob seized him and >
took him before Pontius Pilate, and he, standing ; .:
there in a representative capacity as a judge, said:
"I find no fault in this man." In a representative ;
government, Jesus would have been walking the :
street again in five minutes, a free man. But the
crowd said they wanted a referendum. Pilate per-
mitted a judicial recall, which meant the crucifixion
of Jesus.
The Constitution is an elastic thing. People say:
"You know we are living in different times and
under different conditions, and those men could not
have foreseen this industrial age."
When they wrote the scale of music, do you think
they knew there would ever be radios and phono-!
graphs? But it makes no difference to the scale of
music. When the man first invented the ten digits, i
did he foresee adding machines and the building of:
skyscrapers?
In the Constitution they didn't provide for the'
amount of salary to be paid an official of the govern-!
ment, or the number of cabinet officers. They left;
such things to be determined by future conditions.:
But they drew up a mechanism just as adaptable to^
all future needs of government as the scale of music;
or the ten digits in music and mathematics.
j
W. H. COLLINS MAKES
TOUR OF EASTERN TRADER
Sales Manager of Seeburg Piano Co., and
M. Lenenoff, Seeburg Eastern Representa-
tive, Busy Expanding Seeburg Line.
W. H. Collins, sales manager of the J. P. Seeburg
Piano Co., 1510 Dayton St., Chicago, recently de-
parted for an extended tour of the Eastern trade,
where he will study conditions in the automatic field
with the view of expanding the Seeburg line in that
territory.
Accompanying Mr. Collins is M. Lenenoff, eastern
representative of the J. P. Seeburg Company, and
through whose efforts the Chicago firm is enjoying a
steady demand in the eastern states. Mr. Lenenofl
has given the customary Seeburg service and co-
operation to dealers, who have shown their appre-
ciation with liberal orders.
The many styles and models of the Seeburg lint
afford the dealer an unlimited choice of automatic
instruments. New styles with additional features
were added to the already wide line early in the
summer and have proven conclusively that the See-
burg slogan, "The Key to Positive Profits," is not i
myth.
LARGE DELEGATION VISITS
LESTER PIANO CO. FACTORY
Representatives of J. H. Troup Music House, o
Harrisburg, Inspect Factory.
On Jury lx>th fourteen men from the sales organi
zation of the J. H. Troup Music House, Harrisburg
Pa., Lester piano representatives at the city named
motored by automobile from Harrisburg to Lester
and spent the day there going through the factory
The Harrisburg daily papers published a good re
port of the event which will be reproduced in Presti
next week. A photograph was taken containing sev
enteen figures. Fourteen of these are men of thi
J. H. Troup Music House organization, and th
other three are George Miller, treasurer of the Les
ter Piano Company; Jacob Schiller, vice-president o
sales; and George L. Miller, vice-president of manu
facturing.
The J. H. Troup Music House is one of the mos
active in the East—or anywhere else for that mat
ter. And the fact that the group of fourteen repre
sentatives who visited the Lester factory embrace
four Troups seems to prove an unusual family cc
operation in sustaining the progress of the Harris
burg house.
Enhanced content © 2008-2009 and presented by MBSI - The Musical Box Society International (www.mbsi.org) and the International Arcade Museum (www.arcade-museum.com).
All Rights Reserved. Digitized from the archives of the MBSI with support from NAMM - The International Music Products Association (www.namm.org).
Additional enhancement, optimization, and distribution by the International Arcade Museum. An extensive collection of Presto can be found online at http://www.arcade-museum.com/library/

Download Page 19: PDF File | Image

Download Page 20 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.