Presto

Issue: 1925 2037

18
August 8, 1925.
PRESTO
FACTS VS. THEORIES.
Decorah, Iowa, August 1, 1925.
Rev. Irving E. Putnam,
Joliet, 111.
My Dear Mr. Putnam: I was very sorry that you
did not accept my invitation to attend and speak at
the dinner party I gave to friends here last night.
You will see from the menu enclosed that you were
named as one of the speakers. I had another "rev-
erend" on the bill, and, as I told some I had invited
you to come and speak, they thought the Rev. Mr.
Payne was you. I think, if put to a vote, that at
the dinner last night you would have had more sup-
porters than myself. However, I found quite a few
here were members of my gang or crowd and were
heartily in sympathy with my sentiments.
I noticed in two yesterday's Chicago papers a
statement made by Coroner Oscar Wolff that r five
persons now die in Cook County of alcoholism, w here
one person died from the same before prohibition.
Perhaps you saw this in the Tribune. The same
matter appeared also in the Herald-Examiner of July
31. In the Herald Mr. Wolff says in large type:
"I challenge any man in the United States to read
my figures and then prove to me or to himself that
prohibition has been a success."
Then statistics are given showing that in the years
1918 and 1919 there was a total of 40 deaths from
alcoholism, while in the years 1924 and 1925 the
deaths are 212 This ought to show you that many of
the statements you made to me in your letters are
not correct, and ought to convince you that the theory
on which you preach is one thing, while the facts in
the matter are entirely different
I hope you will read carefully what Mr. Wolff has
to say. There are some very significant facts and
figures which I trust will bring about a change of
heart on your part and it ought to bring about an
apology from you to the Tribune for calling it "The
World s Wettest Newspaper" and "The Greatest
Garbler of the Truth."
I am going to send you a full report of the remarks
at the dinner last night as soon as same is printed by
the papers here. One of my guests last night, Miss
Clara Rollins, who was one of the speakers, sur-
prised me by saying that she attended the same
school with you and not only knew you but also
your brother. She told me that he also was a clergy-
man.
I have not seen yet that the Tribune has published
your letter of July 22 to us, nor my reply of July 25
to you. Quite likely you may see it either in the
Tribune or in this week's issue of the Presto. At all
events you will see your letter in print along with my
letter in reply, in the Decorah Republican, which will
be sent to you; also reports of the dinner in each of
the other two papers, the Decorah Journal and the
Public Opinion.
Piffle of Pacifists.
In answer to your question in the letter of July 22,
"How would you like to ride on your system or hard
roads, etc.?" I would say that I prefer to ride with
one who has taken a drink rather than one who has
taken a quart and has a quart in his pocket or car.
I also noted your remarks in that same letter in
regard to the "Youth Movement" and in reply to
that will ask you to read what was said of it by the
"Massachusetts Public Interests League," 280 Dart-
mouth street, Boston, Massachusetts, in March, 1924,
and at the same time read their report on "Pacifist
Oaths and an Oath for Pacifists," of which the fol-
lowing is an exact copy:
At the International Congress of Women at
Zurich, May 12-17, 1919, of which Jane Adams was
president, the following resolution was moved by
Yella Hertzka, seconded by Madeline Doty, and
voted:
".The International Congress resolves that the Na-
tional Sections be urged, in case of the threat or the
declaration of war, to organize women to refuse their
support in money, work or propaganda."
It was voted to send a delegation to the Socialist
Congress at Lucerne, with this resolution for an in-
ternational strike against war.
Mrs. Harriet Conner Brown, chairman of the Re-
search Committee of the Woman's International
League for Peace and Freedom and a member of its
Board of Directors, gives another form of this
"Slacker Oath" in her booklet, "America Menaced
by Militarism" (page five), which is circulated and
sold by the W. I. L. P. F., of which Jane Addams
is president:
"Go to war, if you want to, but know this: We
have pledged ourselves not to give you our children,
not to encourage or nurse your soldiers, not to knit
a sock, or roll a bandage, or drive a truck, or make a
war speech, or buy a bond."
Kirby Page, in a pamphlet, "War—Its Causes,
Consequences and Cure," which is being circulated
by the thousands among women's clubs, churches,
etc., proposes the following similar pledge:
"We will never again sanction or participate in
any war. We will not allow our pulpits and class
rooms to be used as recruiting stations. We will
not again give our financial or moral support to any
war. We will seek security and justice in other
ways."
Peace without Honor.
Mr. William Howard Gardiner, vice-president of
the Navy League of the U. S., makes the following
comment upon Mr. Kirby's pacifist proposals:
"Had our forefathers developed so strong a peace
complex as Mr. Kirby Page and his associates cher-
ish, we should have had no Revolution, and would
now be a dominion of the British Empire, instead of
a free and independent nation. Had Abraham Lin-
coln developed such a peace complex, instead of the
United States we should have two nations separated
by an imaginary line. And if we had been content
to be governed by such a peace complex and had held
aloof from the World War we should now probably
be a part of the Imperial German Empire."
The pacifists who take the slacker oaths quoted
above are a menace to our country. The true lovers
of peace should realize with Dr. C. H. Levermore,
secretary of the New York Peace Society, that "the
only peace worth having must be a by-product of
international justice," and that peace to be of value,
must insure freedom and right among the nations.
The Rev. Richard J. Cooke, Bishop of Athens,
Tennessee, M. E. Church, says: "The 'pledge' you
quote from the book by Mr. Kirby Page, is un-
American, disloyal and if taken seriously places
every one who takes it in opposition to the Consti-
tution. However, in order that everyone who accepts
it shall fully realize the consequence I am in favor
of sending it around to all the churches and bodies
mentioned in the letter, providing that the following
pledge shall go with it and shall be taken by every
one who signs that 'pledge' or in any manner en-
dorses it or encourages the Anti-American spirit that
produced it.
"1. Having 1 thus pledged ourselves to prevent the
Government of the United States from engaging in
war of any kind in defense of our homes, our liber-
ties, or our lives, which we now enjoy under the
protection of the Government, and
"2. Whereas, having thus pledged ourselves not
only to hamper and destroy the efforts of the govern-
ment, but also not to fight for or in any way assist
the government in defense of our Country, our politi-
cal rights and civic liberties to which we have no
right, except as conferred upon me by the laws of
the United States, nor to any privileges of any kind
which may be preserved to us and our children by
the results of war.
"3. Therefore, Resolved, should the United States
engage in any war of any kind we solemnly pledge
ourselves individually and collectively to surrender
and cancel all rights to citizenship, our homes and
possessions, all privileges and opportunities which
have been made possible for us by the American peo-
ple and secured to us by government protection, our
laws and institutions, and for the defense of which
others have suffered and died, and we furthermore
solemnly pledge ourselves to seek some other coun-
try from which we may obtain something for noth-
ing, or at the cost of the blood and treasure of other
people."
"Youth Movement" Propaganda.
Your talk about WAR and "Youth Movement" in
this letter of July 22 shows as clear as day that you
have true Communistic and Socialistic Pacifist ideas.
In your letter of July 22, you say the "Youth Move-
ment of America, Europe and of Asia is the most
hopeful sign on the horizon of the dawning day." In
reply I would quote from "The Youth Movement"
issued by the Massachusetts Public Interests League:
"The Youth Movement was started some years
before the war, among young people of Germany.
"First boys, and later girls and boys together,
formed themselves into groups, calling themselves
'Wander-Vogel' (birds of passage) for the purpose
of getting away from the towns, into the fields and
woods.
"These young people took a strong stand against
drinking, against immoral movies, books, pictures and
immodest dances.
"The Youth Movement, as started in Germany, was
a revolt against conditions in that country. It is now-
being transplanted in this country.
"But as time went on the movement became the
vehicle for propaganda, notably for communism,
which brought with it a revolt against home restraint
and family ties, the carrying of freedom in education
to a ludicrous extreme, the cult of nudity, and rela-
tions between the sexes which threaten moral chaos.
"The leaders of this movement in this country are
less frank, and the result is that a serious study of
the movement in the LInited States leaves one with
the overpowering sense of insincerity. It pretends
to be one thing and is in reality something quite
different. It works under the guise of education and
religion, while striving to ally American youth with
the Young Communists of Europe, who are the ene-
mies of religion.
"The real menace of the movement in this country
lies in the fact that it is revolutionary propaganda in
romantic disguise subtly preaching to immature
youth the 'ecstacy of demolition' of the foundations
of civilization."
Can Not Always Agree.
As I am out of business now, and both tired and
retired, it does not seem to me that this publicity that
is being given to me and my sentiments can possibly
be of any financial value, but I trust it will help you
greatly. I shall certainly hope to meet you sometime
and have a talk with you face to face. I always try
to keep my temper so long as anyone is logical and
reasonable, and I gather from the tone of your let-
ters that your nature is somewhat like my own,
though 1 think you are not quite as willing to let the
other fellow have his say and thought and ideas,
as I am. That simply goes to prove what I said
to you in my last letter—the wise ones do not always
agree upon everything, as exemplified by your agree-
ing with Bryan on prohibition but disagreeing with
him on evolution.
I shall always believe in and advocate temperance
and tolerance, and talk against the days of the In-
quisition, and the worst days of bigotry generally.
I shall be in Chicago Monday and expect to remain
there until the 14th of August, and shall be glad to
have a call from you at the Illinois Athletic Club,
should you happen to be in the city during my stay.
Yours very truly,
GEO. P. BENT.
MR. BENT ASKS QUESTIONS.
Illinois Athletic Club, Chicago, August 2, 1925.
Rev. Irving E. Putnam,
Joliet, 111.
My Dear Sir: Yesterday, at Decorah, la., I dic-
tated a letter to you which was not written in time
for me to sign before I came away, and, as since I
came here I have received a bundle of letters support-
ing me in what I said as to prohibition, I thought I
would write to you at once and tell you how dis-
appointed my friends were at the dinner I gave in
Decorah the evening of the 31st at your not being-
present, as I had hoped you would be after I invited
you to come as my guest and speak.
The people at Decorah, with whom my wife and I
grew up, had heard of this correspondence between
us and were very much gratified when they saw that
you were on the list of speakers. I talked again in
support of my sentiments to my old friends, and I
fear that if you had spoken in reply to me you would
have had out there a majority in your favor. In
greeting these old friends with whom my wife and I
grew up, on the ground where we were married, as
they left us after the dinner (it was after midnight
before the program was finished), some of them ex-
pressed high approval of your sentiments and dis-
approval of mine, whereas quite a number in saying
good-bye told me that what I said had their hearty
approval.
The whole proceedings at the Decorah dinner will
appear in the Decorah Republican, and I left word to
have a copy sent on to you.
When I got back here I saw a copy of the Presto
of July 25, in which your letter of July 3 and mine
of July 20 appear. 1 had seen in the Tribune the
correspondence between us, as published in their
issue of the 24th, and I also saw your note thanking"
them for publishing this correspondence. I also re-
ceived your letter thanking me for having the corre-
spondence appear in the Tribune.
It seemed to me that your letter of thanks to them
was rather, as we say in California, "unusual," after
your having called them "the World's Wettest News-
paper" and "Greatest Garbler of the Truth."
I sent to the Tribune a copy of your letter to me,
to which I made reply at Superior, Wis., July 25. I
also sent a copy of that correspondence to Presto.
So far as I know, neither paper has published it, but
I shall know tomorrow morning as to Presto. I
have not had time yet to look over today's Tribune,
and so do not know whether they printed this corre-
spondence or not.
Cites Presto Editorials.
In seeing your letter in type in Presto, I discovered
that there are several things in yours of July 3 to
which I did not allude in my letter to you of July 20.
I am enclosing two pages from Presto, issue of
July 25, thinking that possibly you may not have
seen same, though I asked Presto to send on to you
a copy as soon as they printed the correspondence,
as they said they would.
As to your remark that more people by far are
buying musical instruments since prohibition went
into effect thaa ever before, please note the two edi-
torials entitled "A Live Dead One" and "Who Said
This?" which appeared in the same issue along with
our letters.
It is a fact that business in pianos has been very
dead for the last four years. You think otherwise,
but don't know, as I do, although I have been out of
business for nine years and made all of the fortune
you think I have (but
don't know) when the coun-
try was absolutely w 7 et.
The fact of the matter is. though you don't know it,
that most all the business in the piano trade today is
with bootleggers and enforcement officers. They
are buying houses and automobiles and high-priced
pianos and reproducing pianos and self-playing
pianos, while the supporters of the eighteenth amend-
ment and the Volstead Act, those of sobriety, seem
to have forgotten for a time that there is such a thing
as a piano.
I have said to you over and over again that the
bootleggers and the enforcement officers are becom-
ing rapidly rich. This is a fact. You have a theory
to the contrary, but again you don't know.
You will remember that in my.letter to you from
Superior, Wis., of July 25, I closed my letter by quot-
ing Josh Billings, who said that it was better not to
know so much than to know so much that "warn't
so."
Opposes Strong Drink.
Doubtless you have seen the account of the rob-
bery of the Drake Hotel a few days ago, resulting in
the death of two bandits, crazy drunk with moon-
shine, who had previously shot down one of the hotel
clerks in cold blood. It isn't at all likely that they
would have perpetrated this crime had they been able
to get a mild drink like wine or beer, instead of hav-
ing to load up on strong drink, "which is raging," as
per the Scriptm ?s which I quoted to you in my letter
of the 25th.
You perhaps have noticed that I bore down hard in
that letter, or at least tried to make it clear to you.
that the Bible in many places seems to favor the use
of wine (beer, I think, was not then known). But
according to said Bible, everyone who spoke at al',
on the matter of drink opposed drunkenness anc
Enhanced content © 2008-2009 and presented by MBSI - The Musical Box Society International (www.mbsi.org) and the International Arcade Museum (www.arcade-museum.com).
All Rights Reserved. Digitized from the archives of the MBSI with support from NAMM - The International Music Products Association (www.namm.org).
Additional enhancement, optimization, and distribution by the International Arcade Museum. An extensive collection of Presto can be found online at http://www.arcade-museum.com/library/
August 8, 1925.
PRESTO
strong drink. People don't usually get drunk on
mild drinks like wine and beer.
Significantly enough, under the dry act, as you
know, the members of your own profession are al-
lowed the free use of wine, for "sacramental" pur-
poses.
I am just as much opposed to strong drink as you
can possibly be, and it is the strong drink that is
working such great harm to the youths of this
country.
Between the amendment and the laws you favor
all America is being driven to strong drink. I don't
want the saloons back, but, as I have said before, the
cabarets and roadhouses are greater breeders, along
with joy riding and petting parties, of crime and vice
than the saloon ever thought of being, and put it
down for a fact that there are almost as many
cabarets in Chicago as there were saloons before the
eighteenth amendment came into force, and almost
every one of these cabarets and these roadhouses is
selling strong drink to all comers, and the enforce-
ment officers for a price wink the eye, hold out the
hand, and look the other way at the violations going
on.
I believe that members of your "crowd" or "gang"
are awaking to the fact that the amendment and laws
you favor cannot be enforced, and that the whole
business is an absolute farce. The enforcement offi-
cers announce every few days that they have seized
a large quantity of liquor and found a still, but do
you know what they do with that liquor? I have
been told by several that most of that liquor is sold
to bootleggers and they in turn sell it to the public.
I heard of a case recently where a man's premises
sere raided, in a certain nearby town, and two gallons
)f whisky were seized. The man was taken to court
ind the whisky presented in evidence. The man was
|fined a round sum, and the whisky confiscated. After
had gone his way, having paid the fine, the judge
remarked to the sheriff who made the arrest that it
was a pity such excellent liquor should go to waste.
The sheriff warmly agreed, and so they divided it be-
tween them in privacy and took it home.
Unenforceable Laws.
If things go along as they have been doing lately,
vhat is there in life that cheap politicians won't seek
|o control in the way of law, enacting everything
that they should not enact, governing the taste and
ronduct of humanity? Meanwhile, murder still goes
m, so does crime, in spite of all the laws since his-
ory began. I repeat that you can't make people
>ood or honest by law. This is certainly true as to
aws like prohibition laws, which are utterly and ab-
;olutely unenforceable, always have been and always
vill be.
I know that all the recent amendments and laws
rhich your radicals and so-called progressives favor
re retrogressive rather than progressive; they are
ad, and decidedly not good.
I want to tell you of an experience that I recently
ad in New York, Boston, Washington and here in
Chicago. My wife and daughter landed from Europe
n July 10, and I stopped in hotels in the four cities
tamed, and in every one of them I was approached
>y bootleggers wishing to supply me with strong
rink. In my hotel in New York, no less than five
r six different ones were willing to supply all the
trong drink I might have wanted. I assure you that,
k'hile I was tempted, I did not drink.
How you can favor a law which furthers the very
vil that you condemn, by making it impossible to
et a mild drink and forcing those who think they
mst drink or think it is smart to drink, as the young
eople do and as the fashionable people to whom you
efer do, to drink rank poison, is more than I can
ossibly understand as coming from one of the
lergy.
1 again remind you of the Scripture which reads:
Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging, and who-
mever is deceived thereby is not wise."
I favor temperance in everything. I don't want to
ee intolerance drive us back again to the days of the
nquisition.
Don't you know (I do) that almost all the legis-
Ltors who make these laws and pass these amend-
lents break the very laws they make? If you don't
now, I will tell you, that a very great mapority of
le lawmakers and the enforcement officers are drink-
"s of strong drink. They violate the laws they make
lemselves. They are very, very wet in private and
lly dry in public.
I will enclose with this a clipping, "From One of
hem," signed "A Flapper." This, too, appeared in
le Tribune, which you called "wet" and a "garbler"
itil your recent letter of thanks to them for pub-
shing your letter.
This "Flapper" seems to be a member of my
fang." At all events, she says that I know the
cts, and intimates that you don't know what you are
Iking about.
The Decorah Dinner.
I am enclosing also the menu of the dinner at
ecorah, in which you will see that you are listed as
pe of the speakers, just following a cousin of mine,
"reverend" also, who has been a lecturer for twenty-
le years, a la Burton Holmes, and for fifteen or
^enty years before that was pastor of various
lurches.
I read to him the last two of our letters, and he is
sapporter of myself in some things and of yourself
others. He is "on the fence," as they say, and I
>n't know where to class him, as to whether he is a
ember of your "gang" or of mine. There are a lot
people that way. Several of them were at this
nner.
I wish you might have been there and have en-
jhtened us on this subject, and, as I shall be here
I
19
in Chicago for the next ten days before starting for
my home in California via the Yellowstone Park, I
shall be glad to have a call from you at your con-
venience, when we can discuss these matters, and go
on with friendly argument about this subject, but I
really would like to have the judge and jury to make
the decision in the matter as to whether your "gang"
or my own is in the right. And I should like to have
the judge and the members of the jury really know
what is going on, for you seem either not to know
the truth or to ignore it.
I wish you would carefully read the remarks at
this Decorah dinner made by Mr. Biermann, editor
of the Decorah Journal, and by Dr. F. W. Conover,
who is Mayor of Decorah. Note especially the two
cases he spoke of recently before him. Also please
do read the current number of the North American
Review. These things may enlighten you. I hope
you will, for you seem to be in the dark about many
things.
Some Statistics.
I hope also you will especially note what Oscar
Wolff says about the increase of deaths here in Chi-
cago from alcoholism. Vile, .strong stuff is being
taken by those who must have it until this year shows
that there are five times as many deaths from al-
coholism as there were before. I also wish you
would elucidate, if you can, how there was five times
as much strong drink taken before prohibition as
there is now. Then they took a drink; now they
have to take a pint or a quart. Convince me, if you
can, that a drink is five times worse than a quart.
You and your "dry" disciples, as I have said be-
fore, are increasing crime, drunkenness, dope-taking,
insanity, death, and vice generally, as statistics prove.
The laws you and your "gang" favor are deadly in
every sense of the word.
I was surprised to be told by one of my guests and
speakers at Decorah—Miss Clara Rollins—that she
knew you and your brother in college. She was in-
deed surprised at your position, and seems to be one
of my "gang."
Yours very truly,
GEO. P. BENT.
P. S.—As yet I get no reply to mine of July 25.
Do you find it unanswerable?
BENT.
I never met Mr. Roloff, nor did I know of the
Illinois Social Hygiene League until this letter came
to me, nor did I know Mr. A. W. Yeater, of 1554
North Clark street, Chicago, from whose long eight-
page letter I make some extracts and enclose to you
herewith. [The letter, or extracts from it, appear
in the report of Mr. Bent's remarks at the Piano
Club Luncheon.—Ed. Presto.]
I hope you will carefully read and ponder upon
what Mr. Yeater and Mr. Roloff say.
Both these men seem to know what they are talk-
ing about, and, as I have said to you, I don't think
you know at all what you are talking about. You
have a theory, but if you will kindly investigate and
learn the situation and the real facts for yourself I
am certain that you will have a change of heart, and
will become as I have been, an advocate of temper-
ance and tolerance, not of prohibition and bigotry.
I sincerely hope, and if I were a religious man
would pray, that you may become a convert to and
advocate of the sentiments which I have and do not
fear to express to you or to any other person who
has an opposite idea.
I never was politic enough to be a politician. I
never could make votes as McKinley does, for you
say he knows how to talk in order to get votes. I
am more of the type of Grover Cleveland, who said
what he thought, regardless of consequences. He
said in one of his addresses, "It is not a theory but
a condition which confronts us." He was utterly and
absolutely honest and spoke out bravely and boldly
against the heresy of 16 to 1, which your friend
Bryan advocated; that is, I mean your friend Bryan
as to prohibition, but not your friend as to evolution.
Well All Don't Agree.
You will remember in one of my letters I said to
you that it was very good that there was not the
same thought among wise men as to everything,
which was shown by your agreeing with Bryan on
prohibition, but not on evolution. Even very great
and very wise men do disagree, and I think it is a
good thing for the world that this is so. What a
terrible, awful row there would be if all men loved
one particular woman! Can you imagine such a
condition?
Mr. Harry F. Atwood spoke before the Chicago
Piano Club, an organization having over 400 mem-
bers, today at luncheon, and at the close of his re-
ENCLOSURES AND DISCLOSURES.
marks the president of the organization, Mr.
Schoenwald, told a story of a man who appeared be-
Mr. Bent Draws Attention to Expert Testimony as fore a judge in the night court, with two automobile
cushions under his arms, and when the judge asked
to Effects of Dry Law.
him what he was there for and what he wanted done
for him, he replied that someone had stolen his auto-
Chicago, August 3, 1925.
mobile while he was busy outside in the bushes!
Rev. Irving E. Putnam,
He was evidently filled to the full with "strong
306 Richards St,
drink,"
and doubtless his companion was also—•
Joliet, 111.
which
the
Bible says "is raging."
My Dear Sir: Since I wrote you yesterday I
In the words of the Scriptures, Selah, until you
opened and read some of the many letters I found write
me again.
awaiting me here in approval of my sentiments. A
Very truly yours,
few sided with you, but the vote is decidedly against
GEO. P. BENT.
you.
P. S.—I enclose also copy of a letter to Mr. M. T.
I wish to call your attention to the enclosures, that
one entitled "Dry Era Run Drives Many Women Grattan, of Decorah, la., and call your attention par-
Mad." Please note especially what is said in that ticularly to the last two paragraphs but one.
item under the title, "Moral Letdown," which reads
as follows:
AT PIANO CLUB LUNCHEON.
"But there is a letdown in moral standards in this
At the conclusion of the luncheon of the Piano
country, and in my opinion the cause of it all is—pro-
Club, at Illinois Athletic Club, Chicago, Monday,
hibition.
"At the Psychophatic Hospital I treat hundreds of
Aug. 3, the president presented Mr. Bent who, after
women who come from good homes, who are persons of
introductory remarks in which the Putnam corres-
education and refinement.
"These women, normally self-contained, lose all control
of themselves when they start to drink, and become mad pondence was referred to and also a similar "trouble"
with a Rev. Dr. Dyer, of California, spoke in effect
creatures for the time being.
"I see young girls, too—children scarcely out of the as follows:
schoolroom—victims of nervous jags, who carry their
pocket flasks as naturally as their powder puffs."
When I reached Chicago I received an eight-page
Also note the cartoon in the Chicago Tribune of letter from Mr. A. W. Yeater, 1554 North Clark
today headed: "Our National Week-End Sprees," street, Chicago, dated July 24. He must have seen
also "An Old Story," also "The Old Days," also what has appeared in the Chicago Tribune about the
dinner I gave June 9 to some of my oldest friends
"Some Are with Us."
I am going to send to M. A. Nupatree the corre- and the correspondence which has passed between
spondence between us, as it will appear in the Rev. Putnam and myself since, as it appeared in the
Decorah Republican, which is to be issued this week. Tribune. I quote from this long, very interesting
letter the beginning and closing of same:
From One of "The Gang."
I find that neither the Tribune nor Presto has as
yet printed your letter to me of July 22 and mine to
you of July 25, but those two letters will appear in
the Presto of this week, and I shall have sent on to
you copies of both these papers, so that you may see
that what you write to me is not garbled, but is
printed exactly as you write it.
I have not seen B. W.'s article, spoken of in "An
Old Story."
I also in this enclose a copy of a letter written
July 29, by Bernard C. Roloff, who is the executive
secretary of the Illinois Social Hygiene League.
He is one of my "gang" evidently, for in that letter
he says, in the last three paragraphs:
"There is no question but that most of the illicit sex
contacts that bring girls here for treatment are due to
liquor. Before prohibition this condition was rare. At
that time 90 per cent of the women who came here were
infected by their husbands and 90 per cent of the men
who came here were infected by prostitutes. Now 50
per cent of our women patients confess being infected by
'friends' and 70 per cent of the men to being infected by
women 'friends.' The venereal woman of today is the
'cheating' wife, the 'loose' widow and the 'wild' flapper.
These are competing so violently with the old bawdy
house prostitutes that the latter are lost in the shuttle.
"This peculiar situation is directly due to the change
in the drinking: situation.
"Please understand I have no axe to grind in this con-
troversy, but I could not help but give credit where
credit was due. This League does not moralize. It is
not a reform agency such as Brother Putnam makes
himself to be. The fighting we have to do is against the
distinctly recognized evil which we can only reach by
commonsense
methods—prophylaxis—education—treat-
ment."
"Dear Mr. Bent: It is very unfortunate that we have
not more public-spirited men with sufficient backbone to
defy the feminists (and their 'inspired by women' male
co-workers and hirelings) who are now running (and
ruining) our country. Existing conditions were well
stated by Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, when he said:
" 'The America-n people must learn to think of these
things, and to give up that unwillingness, which seems
so characteristic, to discuss or to deal with the disputed
and the disagreeable. We have almost gotten to a point
where public men and those who should be leaders of
opinion hesitate to speak until they know what others
are likely to say, and how what they say will probably
be received by the press and the public. There are not
so many as there should be who are willing to take the
risk of being unpopular for the sake of being right.'
"President Coolidge has told the feminists and their
loyal servants, the preachers that 'the attempt to
dragoon the body when the need is to convince the soul
can end only in revolt,' but they are too wise, of course,
to pay any heed to his advice.
• * *
"I know what their answers will be, for I have put the
facts up to some of these sanctimonious and holier-than-
thou hypocrites who pose as the authorized representa-
tives and spokesmen of Almighty God and keepers of
the keys of the gates of heaven and hell. They will tell
you that something should be done, of course, but will
also tell you to 'let George do it,' as they are 'too busy.'
You could not get them to touch this subject if you pro-
vided them with asbestos gloves, or a pair of tongs a
yard long. They might lose some of their 'generous con-
tributors' by doing so.
Pretence of the "Posers."
"The stand on the subject of sexual morality that has
been taken by these posers, and by the feminists they
represent and serve, is the weakest spot in their armor,
and it is the spot we should attack if we want to dis-
credit them. They are very careful to avoid any public
discussion of this subject, and if you want to make them
squirm and run for cover, just try to force them to come
Enhanced content © 2008-2009 and presented by MBSI - The Musical Box Society International (www.mbsi.org) and the International Arcade Museum (www.arcade-museum.com).
All Rights Reserved. Digitized from the archives of the MBSI with support from NAMM - The International Music Products Association (www.namm.org).
Additional enhancement, optimization, and distribution by the International Arcade Museum. An extensive collection of Presto can be found online at http://www.arcade-museum.com/library/

Download Page 18: PDF File | Image

Download Page 19 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.