Music Trade Review

Issue: 1945 Vol. 104 N. 4

Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
More Opinions from Dealers
Show Preference for 40 Spinet
So many letters from dealers were received after T H E
REVIEW went to press last month regarding the discussion
about the practical height of postwar Spinet pianos, that
they are being printed herewith:
A. E. DeMarko, Sec.-Treas., Reynolds Music House,
Pensacola, Fla.
"We nincur with the manufacturers that say that vertical
pianos should never be made lower than 40 inches, however,
38 inches would be a happy medium.
"With this size piano a manufacturer could give us a piano
that really sounds good and would say in tune longer. You
OVER 40 INCHES HIGH
just simply cannot get this in a 34 inch piano."
H. J. Baker, Baker Piano Co., Seattle, Wash.
Charles H. Meredith, Vice Pres., Shackleton Piano Co.,
"I have been in the piano and pipe organ business, both as
Louisville, Ky.
a dealer and technician since 1903. As a technician, I have
"We are pleased to give you our thoughts regarding- the
studied piano construction religiously, have rebuilt many
height of new pianos to be manufactured in the postwar
instruments for most critical musicians.
"From my experience I say that it is impossible to build an war period.
"Frankly, we—at Shackleton's—have long thought that the
upright piano under 40 inches high that can have a tone or
scale that is in any way practical as a piano. And even looking Spinet or console piano should not be lower than 31) inches or
at it, from the standpoint of proportion in design, any piano 40 inches. If all piano manufacturers could agree on either
under 40 inches high, is not, at all in keeping with the neces- of there minimum requirements we would be delighted; how-
ever, if smaller Spinets are made we would be forced to carry
sary length for a standard keyboard.
some of them.
"I am strictly opposed to anything under 40 inches."
"Perhaps the following- suggestion is absurd, but we firmly
Hugh W. Randall, Pres. Bradford', Milwaukee, Wis.
believe that if all makers of small size pianos could agree
"In our estimation this depends almost entirely on the make on 39 inch or 40 inch minimum—even though they made a
of the piano. We have had some Spinets 30 and 37 inches high piano lower than 39 inches—and then have a universal manu-
that had a very good tone and have proven durable. Chicker- facturers stamp of approval on these instruments, that we
ing, Mason & Hamlin and Steinway never built a low, vertical would sell a majority of the larger pianos, give our customers
piano and probably will not now."
better value, especially in tone quality.
"In considering- this problem—from our angle—we think it a
J. J. Collins, Collins & Erwin Piano Co., Portland, Ore.
"Some time ago we expressed our opinion that when piano highly desirable program to make Spinets and consoles no
manufacturing- is resumed that a good number of instruments lower than 39 inches."
should be built from 40 to 45 inches high and that we also J. C. Sanders, Sanders Piano and Electric Co., St. Louis, Mo.
thought that even a four-foot upright piano would meet with
"We believe the manufacturer is right. Judging from our
ready sale.
exeperience we believe a good scale cannot be made too small
"There is no discounting the fact, however, that there will without the loss of tone and volume.
still be a big demand for pianos from 34 to 37 inches in 7Vfi
"The manufacturer knows this and wants to please the
octave scales. In the event that pianos of this size were dis- dealer, and the dealer's customer. We believe a piano at
continued, then we firmly believe that it would be necessary about 40 inches can be styled very beautifully, and still use
for factories to again adopt the 4>/ 2 and 5 octave scales in a standard keyboard and action."
Tom Thumb pianos."
Frederick Philip Slieff, Vice Pres., Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.,
George F. Cressey, Cressey & Allen, Portland, Me.
Baltimore, Md.
"We here certainly agree with the contention that verticals
"Both my brother, (Jeorge W. Stieff, and the writer are not
should never be made lower than 40 inches.
in favor of the manufacture of upright or console pianos, or
"After all, we are selling musical instruments, and we do the incorrectly so-called pianos less than 40 inches. To build
not believe it's possible to get even a fairly good tone on a pianos smaller is simply appealing to eye value and not to
smaller piano. We say set the size at a minimum of 40 inches the ear. It is impossible to obtain a satisfactory tone out of
and then let the manufacturers get busy and make the cases the base strings and there is not sufficient area in the sound-
as attractive as possible."
ing board to give the proper tone.
A. Davidson, Davidson-Boutell Co., Minneapolis, Minn.
"We were about two years late coming out with our A T era-
"We recommend the vertical console piano be made no Tone and in that time we studied what had been done and in
listening to the small pianos we decided we did not want
lower than forty inches in height."
any
piano with the name Stieff on to sound as the instruments
W. Curtis Busher, Emerson Piano House, Decatur, 111.
did which were built under 40 inches. The height of our
"We believe that it would be much better for the manufac- Stieff VeraTone was 44 inches."
turer and retailer if pianos were made not lower than 40
W. S. Worsley, Win. Worsley Piano Co., Memphis, Tenn.
inches from a standpoint of holding a tuning- better, tone
"The writer has been in the piano business about thirty
quality and direct-blow action which can only be used in a
years. Spending about eight years with the old Melville Clark
40 inch or more piano.
Piano factory at DeKalb, Illinois, and has spent the balance
"However, this will probably be impossible because so many of
in Memphis and the surrounding territory as a tuner
people seem to be mainly interested in very small styles. We and time
a technician.
do believe that it will be to the advantage of the piano
"We have had a great deal of experience with small Spinet
merchant to push the 40 inch Spinet more strenuously in the
pianos. The most satisfactory piano we have sold and the
future."
piano that has given us» less trouble in the verical piano is
C. W. Gould, Gould Music Store, Minneapolis, Minn.
the 40 inch piano with the direct blow action. This piano
"It is my personal opinion gathered from views of many seems to have a better tone, better action, better touch, easier
musicians and also mothers and fathers of the students at our to regulate and easier to tune. This has been our experience."
school that the piano should fit more into the decorative
Edward A. Schmidt, Schmidt Music Co., Davenport, la.
scheme of household furniture, and th.eir general opinion is
is such an important thing', because of what some of
that the piano should be much lower in height and I really the "This
manufacturers have in the past endeavored to do in order
think that the height of 40 inches should be standardized to reduce
the piano in height. They have developed some very
for all pianos in homes."
unnatural and even crude methods of structure which made
Herbert J. Konen, Vice Pres., Noll Piano Co., Milwaukee, Wis. the piano neither musical or mechanically correct. They re-
"We prefer a 40-inch height piano. In our opinion they duced the size of the piano so very much that some of these
should not be lower than 38 ipches, but our choice would be pianos placed in homes where all four casters rest on the
the 40 inch piano, in which size the tone is better and it is carpet so muffled the tone that it made them difficult, hard
possible to get in a direct blow action for better service and tiresome to play. Then too, when a person of more than
5 ft. 6 in, in heiRht sat before one of these pianos they were
accessibility."
12
THE MUSIC TRADE REVIEW, APRIL, 1945
Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
bowed over almost like a cycle as they tried to read the
music.
"Also in an effort to eliminate the drop action the keys had
to be stepped down because the hammer line was almost on
a level with the key-bed. The keyboards on these pianos were
below the standard heights which would not allow sufficient
knee room. The music-desks on the vertical type were so
narrow that the sheet music would rub on the top lid pro-
jection.
"In our humble opinion the piano should never be reduced
to such an extent that the musical value was secondary to
its appearance. We do not believe that a piano should be
lower than 40 inches and the neatest example of this vertical
style piano was the Style 900 Wurlitzer—44 inches in height.
This piano had ample tone—easy to play—splendid action and
correct height for all pianists."
Roy Warden, Roy Warden Piano Co., Nashville, Tenn.
"The trend has been so very definite toward the smaller
piano. The average customer still wants the piano as small
as possible consistent with a reasonable tone.
"A ;>(! inch or 37 inch piano will outsell the 40 inch piano
if the smaller piano has a good tone. Of course if the 40
inch has a good tone and the 3G or 3 7 inch has a very poor
tone, then it will be up to the salesman to prove to the cus-
tomer that he should buy the larger piano because it has a
better tone. Even then the customer's preference is the
smaller case.
"However, we believe that each manufacturer should have
both a 3(> to 27 inch piano and the 40 inch piano, if he can
fit the two sizes in to his set-up."
Earl B. Worden, Earl B. Worden & Co., Utica, N. Y.
"1 should like to see all the better makers adopt the 40 inch
limit for the reason of tone quality first, and secondly, to
make use of the direct blow action.
"However, 1 must admit that the smaller verticals have
great eye appeal, to many buyers. These models will probably
continue in the lines of some makers to supply the class who
buy 'furniture.' However, this type of buyer is gradually on
the way out, for the great increase in musical appreciation
especially in our younger generation, is directing their atten-
tion, and quite seriously, to the makes that build tone quality
in their instruments.
"If the automobile industry had done what the piano indus-
try did it would have amounted to a restyling that could only
deliver a model T performance. This would have been suicidal
and of course unthinkable. Rut that the music industry could
do this only indicates how far we yet have to go in our field,
and how far the public as well as many dealers are from real-
izing that they are or should be selecting- or selling a musical
instrument.
"In the old days when some makers of moderate priced
pianos really built a very pleasing' tone quality in their up-
right models, I have sold many on this point alone, and such
sales st;iy sold for the owners were aware of what a good
musical instrument is supposed to deliver.
"Tone quality can be talked about, very interestingly, and
sold. Hut the instrument being demonstrated on this point
must make good and prove the salesman's contentions. How
many makers would you say have produced anything to talk
about in this respect in recent years?
"Please do not think I am unapprecative of the great stimu-
lus the restyling- gave- to piano sales. But, as I told one maker
whom I have long dealt with, and who T thought had failed
lamentably in the tone quality of his new models, that he
should change the words 'Piano Makers' on his letter-head to
'Furniture Makers.'
"If we as dealers and manufacturers never lose sight of
the fact we are selling music, and instruments to produce it
well, we are on solid ground."
Russell B. Wells, The Chas. E. Wells Music Co., Denver, Colo.
"All of us here feel that the subject you have presented is
one which calls for serious consideration. Many of the factories
before the war yielded to the temptation to put out good
looking pieces of furniture concentrating most of their effort
toward new styling-, small sizes and eccentric finishes without
much thought given to the quality of piano itself. "We all
know that when the string- length is shortened and the area
of the sounding board reduced, very little tone is produced.
There cannot be a genuine fullness of tone.
"As we approach the resumption of manufacture again, we
all believe that it would be much better and more sensible to
raise the height of the Spinet to around forty inches or more.
In no way would this sacrifice appearance and design of the
piano but the added height and increased area of the sounding-
board would produce a depth of tone in genuine proportion.
THE MUSIC TRADE REVIEW, APRIL, 1945
We must think of the piano as basically a musical instrument,
and if we can also have attractive design and finish, so much
the better. We hope, too, that in the rush to manufacture
pianos and get them to the hungry music dealers over the
country, the factories will take enough time to put out a
musical instrument worthy to be called a piano, from a quality
and musical standpoint. Already we have had evidences of
careless attention to important details in the manufacture
and assembly of pianos."
E. E. Woods, Manager, Roat Music Co., Battle Creek, Mich.
"Well informed piano men agree that smaller pianos are not
very good intone, scale'and touch, and worst of all the drop
actions are difficult to reg-ulate, and not many of them stay
in tune, I had some of the best known and highest priced up
to 311 inches in height that had to be tuned frequently, and
but one make of small ones that did stay well in tune, this
make is not well known, and we could not determine, why it
did not need tuning so often, and while ke know many buyers
want small sizes, because they don't know quality, the only
way to get away from small ones would be for factories to
discontinue making them.
"Another thing I can't understand is why factories send
wholesale prices in unsealed mail or under a one cent stamp,
but a few continue to do so."
Tony Zender, Lima, Ohio
"I positively think that any piano should not be lower
than 40 inches. Many of the Spinets we had were not satis-
factory at all. Tuners wouldn't tune some of them."
UNDER 40 INCHES HIGH
A. B. Fredhold, Birkel Richardson Co., Los Angeles, Cal.
"If you could get every piano manufacturer to agree not
to make any piano under 40 inches high, that would be one
thing—there would not be anything else for the public to
buy—and of courses, they would have to buy a 40 inch piano
and would, usually, therefrom get a better toned instrument.
"If manufacturers did restrict the size limits of Vertical
Pianos they would eliminate a portion of their market, and
we do not believe it is good business for the industry to
eliminate any portion of the piano market. Naturally we
would like to sell more higher priced vertical and grand,
pianos, and better toned pianos, but there is a definite demand
for smaller pianos, and the retailer for his own protection,
must carry these smaller pianos.
"We think manufacturers should try to improve the quality
of their pianos and develop more tone in Vertical Pianos under
40 inches in height regardless of the cost. If some people
want small pianos, give them higher priced, finer quality,
small pianos."
C. M. Belknap, Critchett Piano Co., Des Moines, la.
"It is our opinion that there has never been a vertical piano
built under 40 inches or 41 inches with anything like accept-
able tone, but we are all after sales volume and the past
years from 1037 to 1942 surely proved that the largest per-
centage of piano buyers bought their pianos for furniture
in the first place and tone in the second. So it looks to us
like as long as anybody builds a 34 to 38 inch Spinet with eye
appeal, they will be sold regardless of its tonal qualities. And
it looks to us as though the man in the furniture or home
appliance department in the furniture or chain store will be
able to sell this type of piano as well as anybody else under
the present O.P.A. regulation on new pianos. We wonder if
many of the old established piano houses will be able to live
on the fine grands and better verticals that they may sell to
musicians or those more critical in tone."
E. B. Critchett, Critchett Piano Co., San Antonio, Texas
"Not everyone can afford the finest piano, bUt for those
who can afford and want to buy a fine instrument, there
should be a 40 inch piano but it' should be of the very finest
quality.
"For those who do not want the best, nor can afford an
expensive piano, there should be cheaper instruments and
these should not need to be as large. In fact they should he
very small. I have seen very small pianos that were quite
good, but very inexpensive. I have also seen plenty of very
large pianos that were pretty bad, but still not expensive,
and there should be no need of building a large piano unless
it is to be a good one. No manufacturer would build a larg-e
grand unless they intended it to be a real good piano.
"It is undoubtedly easier to construct a simple and inex-
pensive piano 35 inches or 36 inches high, especially the case
and there are plenty of people who want nothing more.

Download Page 12: PDF File | Image

Download Page 13 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.