Music Trade Review

Issue: 1925 Vol. 81 N. 13

Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
REVIEW
THE
VOL. LXXXI. No. 13 Published Every SaUrday. Edward Lyman Bill, Inc., 383 Madiscn Ave., New York, N. Y. Sept. 26,1925
Sln8
j!. ( £ o & e r 8 i° ea c r ent "
Retail Music Merchant's Overhead
and Its Relation to Volume
Definitions of the Various Terms Commonly Used in the Study of This Problem and the Various Factors
Which Enter Into This Most Important of All Relationships in Conducting a Retail Business—
an Address by Dan W. Dettelbach Before the Music Merchants' Association of Ohio
different phases, one the buying of merchandise
and the other the selling. Stated differently,
gross profit is merely the measure of buying and
selling operations which are unaffected by cost
in the commercial expense the average business
can realize satisfactory profits on a smaller
margin of profit on sales. Further on we shall
endeavor to determine the causes for this.
In order that you may the more readily fol-
low the discussion there has been prepared and
COMP \ N V A
COMPANY B
A V OF A n & c
COMPANV -
COMPANV D
handed you two exhibits to which reference will
..
$114467 74
100.
$>57/,27 57
100.
$4;9.677,I2
$285,324 14
SALES
!00.
$287.85483
100.
COST OF SALES
be made from time to time. Your attention is
28.17&O2
. 23 75
40 07
92.92fl.68
3f>06
192J.1O.0I
104 44320
36 65
73.539 48
25 SS
66 47
49 14
162,614.13
63.12
235,767.1*
159.(190 55
pi"cSr """' . ' " . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
55.75
180.78B0O
62 80
78.88984
now directed to Exhibit A, which has been pre-
$107,068,76
90.22
KS5.534.R1
99 18
S427.997.69
89 14
02 40
S-VO.S.U75
$2S4,327<8
88 35
24.54
29.12115
Lc« : Inventory—D«. 31st
30.70
142,169.83
29.63
79.09961
83,403 53
29.30
84.457 40
29.34
pared from data of four different companies
$
77.947
61
COST OF SALES
65.68
$176.435 20
68.48
59.58
$2X5.827.86
$180,070 22
63.10
$169,870.08
59.01
dealing
in musical instruments.
$193.84926
34.32
$
81.192.37
31,52
40.42
$105.253
92
$ 40.720U
GROSS PROFIT
36.90
$117,984.75
40.99
Lower Percentage
Salahe,
$ 35.804 23
$ 23.02277
19 40
u m *1!)1.9I7.5A
S 53.581 32
18.78
$ 53.594.S3
1862
6.388.58
379392
3.21
2O5S8I5
5 54
12.25ASB
4 .10
2 47
13,892.13
4. (U
Continuing our discussion of gross profits to
7.604 50
Adverting '.'.'.'l'.'.['.'.'.\\'.'.[\[\\'.'.\\'.'.'..',\.
2,491 80
2 01
24.IIV.J7
5 01
I t . 370.92
2 %
14,067.34
4.B8
Exhibit A
17.11.26
778 79
66
3,1:7 25
1 STO 11)
.67
6.727.89
2.34
10,19172
.. ,
4,189.46
3.53.
3B.IA7 05
O«n« and Store E»Mnj«" [.'.'.\'.'.".'.'.\'.','.'.'.
17A7ft..W
5,<*
11,428.76
6 2(1
3 97
volume you will note by referring to Exhibit A
1.718 02
1.378.50
Salei Promotion
.67
5,415.88
.48
I 88
Prepared f o r
5.728 13
8.058.1.1
2 22
4.083.7c,
Delivery Expense
2 8J
I 42
'.'. '"lisVij " i as
3,565
9n
1 .ID
1.26470
44
o9
that Companies A and B bear out the statement
2JIL56
23727
2.282
98
4,951
5S
1.49
1.19
Tajej—County and' S ' a t c ' . . . . . . . . . - . ' - " . . . .
3.405 70
815.61
! 72
and C o p y -
7 ; IB 51
142 00
237.55
.12
.11
OS
.119011
'20
243 50
.08
57150
relative to a lower percentage of gross profit
123 49
1.185.76
.04
.04
110 91
B i d Account* Charted O f f . . . .
.05
41
20925
righted
by
the
$ 37.42455
$223.350 52
Jl 53
46.56
SU2 018.O5
$ 75.280.87
29.22
.19.26
$1I6.S4985
40 50
on increased volume, Company B showing a de-
Music Mer-
271
$ 5,911.50
2.10
« 11
$ o_-oj.,-.l
OPERATING PROFIT
S 3.295 58
$ 1.13490
! .1«
crease of 2.8 per cent in gross profit on a volume
OTHER INCOME over OTHER t X P E N S E
chants' Asso-
5 .1.7890R
$ I0.S62.94
Income Inlrrnt Received
3 19
$ 26.281.58
5.47
$ 1.678.15
3 71
$ 10.601 82
of sales a little better than double. In com-
173C8
4.236.88
14
6,05500
2.35
6,482.58
1.35
127.64
ciation of Ohio
Discount Earned . . . . . .
2.004.31
668.10
.23
1JW.78
Miscellaneous
61949
52
298.42
305.97
.11
.10
paring this measure as between companies one
3.8$
6
82
$
15,793.89
TOTAL OTHER INCOME.
t 10.0J5.f8
$ 32764.16
5.52
..
S 4.58165
3.88
% 12.627.21
4 .IS
must take into consideration variations of gross
txocn»c
Intern! Paid
4 42
$ 7.63161
S 5255 44
f 5.457 M
$ 12,182.29
2.>3
2.67
2.11
$ 4.006.14
1.39
Discount Allowed •
.60
237.58
| 712.74
.08
profit margin due to effectiveness in manage-
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE
$ 5,457 11
t 12,18220
$ 5.96818
5.02
2 11
2,53
5 7,809.19
2 75
S 4.006.14
1.39
ment, especially from the buying standpoint.
NET OTHER INCOME . . .
..
$ Ijl6.i
S 4.57877
$ 20.581 87
4.29
1.77
$ 7.924.70
2.77
S 8.621 HI
2.99
NET PROFIT OR LOSS (Accrual)
I 62
* 10.490.27
4 07
$ 1,15997
41
$ 1,90905
$ 9.7*03
» » «
Your attention is again called to Exhibit A and
3.39
Add or Dtiotl-
the figures under the columns headed Companies
076t)/(
J66
K>J27
Pruf,. on . h . h m . l l n « m ha»i.
o,
10«697
3 7.1
38,864.37
4.425,87
1.53
4.92
C and D wherein the per cent of gross profit
xnrr-r - —
llilhniil.ll,ll II.Ililllll:
-
is higher on an increased volume, undoubtedly
due to better or greater buying power, especially
to overhead as commercial expense as the term and expense of doing business, or the turnovers. as to Company C, which does both a wholesale
Sales volume in the commercial field has a and retail business.
will be more readily understood.
When comparing commercial expense (over-
Av(. lor
-CALENDAR YEARS-
head) to volume we have only one basis of
$643,600,110
$876,611000
$799.400.1
comparison that is at all significant and that is
$2 S 91 40000
$190,200-00
$258.20000
the sales volume. In this discussion we shall
268.7(10 IK)
8470000
137.000.00
182*00.00
$ 23,60000
$75,60000
$72,000.00
$30,800.00
$68,100(10
treat the subject in the light of profits, and the
$ S3,20O0O
OPERATING PROFIT
OTHER INtOMF.
15.90000
significant profit margins considered in rela-
9.300110
12.800 00
10.900.00
$ 90,200 JO
$ 39,50000
$ 62,50000
$88.400 00
"$82.900 00
$ 10,700.00
tionship to sales and sales volume are: I. Gross
OTHER F.XPFNSE
1.400.00
1.300.00
1.20000
Inirre.t on llt-int ViyMr
profits; 2. Operating profits; 3. Net profits.
Exhibit B
$ 38.100.00
$_82.9«l.0O
$_45,0O0(H
$ 88.400 00
$_9.50000
NET PROFIT
These three profit margins are basic in nature Prepared f o r
•H to Sale.
% to Sal«
» to S.ilcs
•* to Sales
% to Bales
100.
ion.
too.
100.
^
63 43
6367
66.18
63 73
and should be clearly reflected or set forth in and C o p y -
COST" OF SALES
36. H
33 82
35.33
G":OSS
PROFIT
the operating statement.
righted by the
(CiMMFRCIAL EXPENSE (Overhead)
5.52
6
02
M
u
s
i
c
M
e
r
-
Gross Profit
1 vecutive Sal.r,e.
7 75
9 ol
7.87
mm, ind Slort Salaries
5 88
308
3 59
Gross profit is the margin between net sales chants' Asso-
3 39
4.40
37
.33
34
1.17
7S
i,rt>p
and cost of sales. Operating profit is the mar- ciation of Ohio
1.76
54
I J i n - C o u n t ) Jiid Slate
V ..n and Ufnet hipcnw
gin between gross profit and commercial ex-
2.24
pense. Net profit is the balance after taking
OPERATING PROFIT
7 76
into consideration financial income and expense.
OTHER INCOME and OTHER EXPENSE
:i7
2 52
The relation of gross profits to volume is to be
2.16
1 56
NET OTHER INCOME
considered only as to the margin between cost
686
II 87
NET PROFIT
of sales and sales.
In discussing any subject it is well first to in-
quire into the fundamentals underlying the sub- tendency to lower the gross profit margin per
Your attention is directed at this time to the
ject, and we find gross profits to consist of two cent due to the fact that with increased volume
fact that on Exhibit A the volume of sales in
(Continued on page 4)
in connection with a lesser degree of increase
VERHEAD as applying to a commercial
enterprise is simply another name for
general and administrative or commercial
expenses, consequently we shall hereafter refer
O
C
100
j1
.40
3
117
3
" '
808
$230.80000
$
47,100.00
$
59.8OOOU
$
59.100.00
12,700 00
70Q.OO
• % to S a k s
S
1 E S
64 14
35.85
7 34
8.08
5.28
3.49
1.13
2.72
33.62
28 54
2.95
7.32
1.98
.07
©By Dan W. Dettelbach Audit Co., Cleveland, Ohio.
1 82
1.91
4.77
9
2.1
Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
THE
MUSIC
TRADE
REVIEW
SEPTEMBER 26, 1925
The Retail Music Merchant's Overhead and Its Relation to Volume—(Cont'd from page 3)
each case is approximately double as to Com-
panics A, B and C, and that the sales volume of
Company D approximates the average of Com-
panies A, B and C, making comparisons easier
of interpretation.
On exhibit B you will note that with the excep-
tion of the year 1922 the lower margin of gross
per cent is reflected. The year 1924, however,
reflects an upward trend, which is principally due
to greater buying power, this company having
opened a second store in 1923. It might be
remarked here that the business of the company
as reflected on Exhibit B is not that of a com-
pany dealing in musical instruments but one
dealing in furniture on the instalment basis and
is used for purposes of illustration due to its
remarkable success and effective management in
terms of profit.
Operating Profit
Operating profit, as previously stated, is the
margin between gross profit and commercial
expense or the cost of doing business and is the
final measure of the effectiveness of manage-
ment in its merchandising and operating trans-
actions. Executives should know the nature and
detail of the funds they expend for overhead
and they should further analyze same in rela-
tionship to or connection with the volume of
sales to determine the proper margin they
should realize in order to compensate capital
for its use and also to attain a better than nor-
mal result from trading operations if it be pos-
sible to do so. It is only by a study of- the
various elements making up commercial expense
as considered to volume that an executive can
Certain variables occur in the classes of ex-
penses making up the total commercial ex-
pense, some items increasing proportionately to
the increase in volume of sales, while other
items of cost will vary to a lesser degree. What-
ever difference there is in these variations as
between companies is attributable for the most
part to differences in effectiveness in manage-
ment.
As stated before, volume can be increased and
savings effected through improved merchandise
turnover, on insurance, taxes, executive salaries,
store and office expense, rent, etc., that is, a
greater volume of business can be accomplished
on approximately the same expenditures due
allowance being made for some increase, of
course. It will ordinarily be found, however,
that any increase in sales volume will actuate
a graduated increase in such items as advertis-
ing, sales salaries, delivery expense, etc., allow-
ing, of course, for the take up of idle expense
or lost time usually found in a business with
less than a normal inventory turnover.
In order that you may more fully visualize
the advantages gained in the increase of volume
your attention is directed to the exhibit as set
forth herewith, which treats of the increases in
terms of percentages of volume increase. The
ratio set forth are based on the increases as
set forth on Exhibit B using the figures fur the
years 1919, 1920 and 1921, and comparing the
volume of increases with the operations for the
year 1918 on Exhibit B:
SCHEDULE SHOWING PER CENT OF INCREASE
IN VOLUME

1919
hope to attain maximum results on a minimum
expense and get effectiveness in management.
The margin of operating profits on sales
necessarily varies as between different com-
panies. One principal factor which creates this
.
.
,
,.™
.
, ..
variation is the difference in turnovers of the
following nature: Turnover of capital used,
turnover of inventories, turnover of accounts re-
ceivable, turnover of fixed property investment
.
-
,.
.. ,
and t u r n o v e r of w o r k i n g capital.
Since we m u s t of necessity limit this discus-
sion only two of the preceding turnovers will
be discussed, namely, turnover of inventories
and accounts receivable. The former relates to
operating profits and the latter to net profits,
it being a financial problem.
Turnover of inventories is sometimes figured
erroneously, some computing it on the ratio of
average inventory to sales which is not a sound
measure of inventory turnover in as much as the
inventory covers only cost of goods and sales
includes cost of goods plus margin of profit.
The proper method to compute the inventory
turnover for a retail merchandising industry is
to take the ratio of the opening inventory to
cost of sales for the year or period covered,
being careful to reduce any ratios computed for
a period less than a year to a yearly basis.
Cost of Carrying Stocks
Only a comparatively small number of execu-
tives appreciate fully what it costs to carry
stocks and consider the advantages to be gained
in a more rapid inventory turnover. In any
line of merchandising we find that there is a
normal rate of turnover within which stocks
should be converted into receivables or cash.
Subnormal turnovers sacrifice profits and place
a busniess in a disadvantageous position with
competitors whose turnovers are normal or bet-
ter, thereby effecting savings through smaller
liabilities, eliminating necessity for borrowed
capital and paying interest, losses due to price
decline and changing styles and ideas, and sav-
ings effected in cost of carrying goods as in-
surance, taxes, rent, etc.
Inventory turnover is discussed at this point
as it affects more or less several or more of the
items making up the cost of doing business as
outlined in the preceding paragraph.
&
W
&
W
Highest
Quality
gales
Gross Profit
Commercial Expense—Total ..
Increase
110.80
108.09
62.70
1920
1921
p c of P C of
Increase Increase
189.30
183.80
183.59
177.46
115.60
114.40
Commercial Expense—Detail:
Executive Salaries
office and Store Salaries
Rent
Advertising
Insurance
Delivery Expense
...
Taxes—County and State....
Store and Office Expense
^ u t ^ e v a r i a n c e can > t o t n e extent of taxes on
merchandise, be controlled by a favorable in-
ventory turnover. In the main, however, it is
partly without the control of managing execu-
tiyes w h a t
this expense
w i l l bC( b e m g
deter .
, ,
74.05
118.64
3.37
122.22
130.00
27 50
33.33
34.66
161.07
260.20
7.17
318.51
20.00
90.00
111.11
116.66
161.07
241.36
9.28
337.04
240.00
70.00
200.00
101.33
Operating Profit
694.03 1,028.36 974.70
From this schedule it is easy to follow the
trend of expense in volume increase. You will
note that the per cent of increase in the volume
of gross profit is in each case slightly under
that of the sales for the corresponding year.
At the same time commercial expense shows
an increase, but one that does not correspond
in volume to that of sales.
Variables to Expense
We shall now discuss the item of variables
that occur in the makeup of commercial expense,
treating same in the light of the volume in-
creases as to per cent as set forth on the
schedule.
Executive salaries here show an abnormal
increase in volume, but this company, whose
operations are analyzed here, is a close corpora-
tion and this in a measure accounts for the con-
siderable increase in executive salaries.
Of
course, any company should show a proportion-
ate increase in this class of expenditure propor-
tionate to the sales volume increase, providing,
of course, that operating and net profits also
increase in volume commensurate to the other
increases. It must be considered that capable
executives are judged by results and in terms
of profit and should be so compensated.
Office and store salaries in this case show a
very abnormal increase and a search of our
records on the data of this company did not
reveal any light on the abnormalcy of this in-
crease. Suffice it to say that the same volume
of sales could probably have been accomplished
on an increase in volume of this class of ex-
pense somewhat under that shown.
J (\ TWT \T
1
VJ 11 JY
Rent is the one cost that is not subject to so
great a variation in the increase in volume as
the other costs. In the case at hand this item
of cost has decreased instead of increased. This
is undoubtedly due to overlapping of charges,
that is, the charging of expenditures to one
year that are either in part or as a whole ap-
plicable to a subsequent period. Rapid merchan-
dise turnover furnishes opportunity to increase
volume without increasing this item of expense
in proportion to the increase in sales volume,
Advertising will, of course, increase in volume
and to a great extent proportionate in a meas-
ure to the increase in sales as it is productive
What that increase should be, how-
o f sales.
ever, is dependent on the kind of advertising
being done and just what channels of advertis-
ing to use is a local problem with each indi-
vidual company and should be determined in
the light of past experiences.
Insurance costs vary in per cent to increase
compared to sales volume, dependent more or
less on the inventory turnover as previously
discussed. While it is not the intent here to
advise how to manage your business it is well
to point out that insurance experts should be
consulted as to the proper amount and class of
insurance to carry in order to obtain a maximum
Our ex-
o f protection at a minimum of cost.
perience in auditing reveals a none too careful
analysis made of this problem,
Delivery expense or cost will, of course, in-
crease proportionately to increase in sales vol-
umes, which is a self-evident fact.
Taxes, county and State, vary to some extent,
| J 1 7 \ T C* If
| j Jjy l l t l "
. .
mined by outside sources.
Store and office expense will, of course, in-
crease as the volume of sales increase, but the
increase should not approximate the ratio of
.

1
1
" i c r e a s e m sales volume.
Ratio of Costs to Sales
Your attention is called to Exhibit B, the
lower set of figures which set forth the ratio
of the various costs to sales
I n t h i s scne dule
; t should be noted that five of the eight classes
o f expense shown show a favorable decrease in
r a t i o to sales. On Exhibit A, however, the same
favorable decreases are not revealed, undoubt-
d u e to the fact that this comparison con-
e ^\ y
siders the operations of four distinct companies
} n which the effectiveness of management differ,
From this it is seen how difficult it would be
to chart the course of a business successfully
based on average operating percentages of a
small group of representative companies. Only
when figures for a large number of representa-
tive companies are available can a reliable coni-
parison be made and then only as a standard
to be guided by.
Net profit as previously stated is residue of
profit after considering financial losses and
credits as interest, discount, etc. Net other
income is affected by two turnovers, both apply-
ing to one specific financial expense, namely, in-
terest and to one financial income which is pur-
chase discount. The two turnovers referred to
are turnover of inventory and turnover of re-
ceivables. The former has been discussed in its
relationship to operating profits and we will now
discuss same on its effect to net other income,
Since a rapid inventory turnover avoids tying
up capital in inventories or a large amount of
slow-moving stock it releases capital available
for prompt payment of invoices, thereby realiz-
ing a greater volume of purchase discounts. It
also creates capital to reduce the liability on
borrowed money, thereby reducing interest
charges,
(Continued on page 28)
Highest
Quality
yfi.
W
y&
W

Download Page 3: PDF File | Image

Download Page 4 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.