Music Trade Review

Issue: 1917 Vol. 65 N. 11

Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
THE
MUSIC TRADE
REVIEW
15
Oiuf TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
CONDUCTED BY WILLIAM BRAID WHITE
SPLICES
"Dear Mr. White—Allow me to thank you for
the many good suggestions received in the past
five years through your page in The Review. I
wish to offer a method of tying a square knot
in broken bass strings, which I worked out for
myself many years ago, and which is less liable
to break than your method of the loop given
August 25. I enclose sample, which will show
how to bend the wire so that the two pieces
will pull together. If this is worth printing you
may use it. S. D. Kennison, Minneapolis,
Minn."
Mr. Kennison takes his old wire and the new
piece and in each bends over the end so as to
bring the bent-over portion parallel with the
original length, and about one-fourth inch dis-
tant from it. The two parallel lines of wire are
then slightly pinched together about one-fourth
inch from the bend, and the embryo loop thus
formed is then slightly bent upwards to make
a very blunt angle with the parallel lines. The
free end of the bent-over piece is also slightly
bent upwards and the two pieces are then
hooked into each other. They should now, upon
being tightened, curl together and twist over
on each other, making a firm knot.
Very good, Mr. Kennison, you do it very
gently. But does the redoubtable Manning pro-
ceed so mercifully? Not, in the words of the
poet, by a jug-full. See, if your feelings can
stand the harrowing process, by what unmerciful
methods the Elyrian wages war. See, and be
struck with terror!
Or to drop the tragic and come back to terra
cotta, as Mrs. Malaprop used to say, behold what
I shall denominate the slam positive:
"Dear Mr. White—I agree with you that there
are several ways of splicing bass strings; at
least there is a right way and a wrong way.
But why you should select the worst possible
way of all, call it the easiest, and proceed to
describe it, passes my power of insight, un-
less it may have been done to provoke criti-
cism. If so, it ought to accomplish its pur-
pose.
"I suppose that factory-trained men, never hav-
ing occasion to splice strings, cannot be blamed
for not knowing how; but the amateurish
method which you described in the last Review
is precisely the kind of a splice which always ex-
cites the derision, if not the profanity, of the
skilled workman who believes in neatness and
efficiency. With its many turns of wire par-
tially untwisted and drawn out, it takes up a
space of three or four inches in length and pre-
sents a most uncouth and bunglesome appear-
ance. It consumes too much wire in the mak-
ing, and it never gets done stretching. More-
over, it will not stand much strain without cut-
ting itself in two, in the same way that the
grocery clerk does with his twine. By twisting
it around the fingers so as to form two loops
which interlock, like yours, it is surprising how
easily a stout twine may be severed.
"The best splice for piano wire is the square
knot. It is not much over a half inch in
length, takes very little wire, does not stretch
further when once drawn together; and never
breaks. The wire will break somewhere else
before the splice will give way.
FAUST SCHOOL OF TUNING
Piano, Player-Piano, Pipe and Reed Organ Tuning and Re-
pairing, alt* Regulating, Voicing, Varnishing and Polishing
This formerly was the tuning department of the New
England Conservatory of Music, and Oliver C. Faust was
head of the department for 20 years previous to its dis-
continuance.
Courses in mathematical piano scale construction and
drafting of same have been added.
Pupils have daily practise in Chickering & Sons' factory.
^Year Book sent free upon request.
27-29 GAINSBOROUGH ST., BOSTON. MASS.
"To make it: With your round-nose pliers
take hold of the wire about three-eighths of one-
half inch from the end, according to the thick-
ness of the wire, and bend into a hook, so that
the two branches of the hook are parallel. If,
before doing this, the short end of the wire is
first bent somewhat in the opposite direction,
the two parts may be made to lie close to-
gether and parallel; while the round bow or
end will be wider. Next, take this hook flatwise
between the jaws of your flat pliers, so as to
allow nearly one-fourth inch of the round end,
where the wire is bent, to project outside the
jaws. Take this loop, also flatwise, with your
round pliers and bend it sidewise about as far
as you have room to do.
'
"Treat the other piece of wire in the same
way; and you will find that the two. hooks can
be easily put together so that the double wire
of each piece will pass through the loop of
the other, forming a true square knot.
"The only precaution necessary is to see that
the two hooks are alike, with the bows bent
towards the same side. Both rights, or both
lefts; but not one right and the other left.
Then, when put together, the two wires which
receive the strain will come together and twist
around each other firmly, while the two short
ends will be likewise interlocked.
"The proper way to make a neat job in splic-
ing a bass string is to turn it end for end and
ascertain if the eye end is long enough for wind-
ing on the tuning-pin (after cutting off the eye,
of course). If so, splice on a new eye end and
you can entirely conceal the splice behind the
muffling tapes in the bottom of the piano.
"A newly-spliced string should be tuned some-
what too sharp, so as to make allowance for
the stretching of the piece of new wire spliced
on. W. B. Manning, Elyria, O."
In a private letter to me Brother Manning
expresses a desire to hide himself modestly be-
hind the pseudonym "A Veteran." He does
not wish, he says, to monopolize the department.
Let me assure him he does not. We are always
glad to hear from him; for he always has some-
thing to say.
The little treatise on splices is very much to
the point and covers the subject in fine style.
But, as one who finds himself, to his surprise
but without other damage, pilloried as amateur-
ish, and an unskilled workman who is a foe to
neatness and efficiency, perhaps I had better
say no more. I might make the brother really
mad; and then!
It is true that my splices have usually looked
good and have for some reason quite refused
to break as my venerable Elyrian mentor proves
they must. But his proposal, as well as that
of Brother Kennison, is first class in every re-
spect; and I thank both the brethren for taking
the trouble to take me up.
TEMPERAMENT
Comes my friend Kennison once more, this
time to break a lance in the famous T. T. (Tem-
perament Tourney, of course). Says he:
"A word on the temperament question, please.
I think the system of Thirds from C to C is the
quickest method for the beginner to learn, as
by it he can learn all the intervals. Where he
has this method he should be able to set a tem-
Professional Tuners
perament anywhere within a range of two oc-
taves. Usually he can get a better tempera-
ment before he can get good octaves or unisons.
"Later, when I found nearly all tuners using
Fourths and Fifths, from F to F, and not wish-
ing to be an odd one, I decided I could use
F to F, as well as C to C, using the Fourth and
Fifth method. But I still use the Thirds and
Sixths. In learning the latter, we were taught to
get the beat-rate of the Third, lower C to E,
fixed firmly in our minds. Now, when using the
other, I try to have the rate F—A fixed; and
one is as easy as the other to remember. So
now I am using a method practically the same
as yours. I was a student of F. W. Hale in
Boston in the year 1889. Respectfully, S. D.
Kennison, Minneapolis, Minn."
All right, Brother Kennison. You have had
both methods. But you do not tell us which
you really prefer, unless we are to suppose by
your sticking to Fourths and Fifths for so long,
that you find them to be your best bet. Is it so?
A "TEMPERAMENTAL" MOTION
"Dear Mr. White—I have read all the letters
on Temperament to date, but have noticed no
reference to what I believe is a point worthy
of consideration, viz.: The relation of the tem-
perament of the tuner to the tempering of the
scale.
"Is it not possible that one method would suit
a certain tuner better than another one would?
The objects in view are (1) to get an even tem-
permanent, and (2) to tune the piano. If the
two octave method is used, the piano is that
much nearer tuned when the temperament is
set, providing no mistakes are made.
"Every first class tuner aims at accuracy, so-
lidity and speed, and he will not be satisfied
until he thinks he has discovered the best method
to this end. I never used the system of Thirds,
although O. C. Faust explained it to me years
ago, but I first used the old system of Fourths
and Fifths in which you start with C or A and
go half way around the circle, then go back and
finish in the opposite direction. My work was
unsatisfactory to myself, and I set about to
find a method better suited to my temperament.
I soon discovered that I could more easily leave
a string sharp than flat and began to devise a
system in which I could leave every string sharp
and still flat my Fifths. Of course, to do this
(Continued on page 16)
T U R N YOUR STRAIGHT
1 PIANOS INTO PLAYERS
We specialize in the installation of 88-note
player actions in straight pianos, and we
guarantee absolute satisfaction.
Our charges for this service are so nominal
that they will surprise you.
Write for prices and particulars.
Manufacturers, dealers and tuners sup-
plied with player actions tor used pianos
JENK1NSON PLAYER ACTION CO., Inc.
912-914 Elm St.
Cincinnati, O.
POLKS SCHOOL
PIANO TUNING
OF
The Pioneer School
who feel the need of improving their technical
and practical knowledge in advanced tuning,
grand piano work and general player work, are
invited to correspond with me. I am prepared to
take a few such gentlemen for short coaching
courses in these subjects. I do not teach by cor-
respondence. Address, for particulars,
UP-TO-DATE METHODS
WILLIAM BRAID WHITE
6949 Harper Arenue
Chicago, Ills.
VALPARAISO,
with
Frmm Catalogue
INDIANA
Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
THE
16
MUSIC
TRADE
REVIEW
fers me a comprehensive statement of reasons
for his faith in his method, J. C. Miller has been
(Continued from page 15)
good enough to make some valuable and weighty
I tune all my Fourths above and Fifths from observations from his point of view, and George
below. I choose the octave between middle C L. Maitland makes some equally interesting re-
and the C below where the beats are relatively marks. These I shall publish, and then 1 think
slow and distinct. I have Thirds or Sixths to the feast of reason and flow of soul may be fitly
prove every note by except three. I have never brought to an end with some general remarks
met a tuner who used this system, although it by the toastmaster, in the course of which he
seems to me that it is the easiest one possible hopes to sift the chaff from the wheat, and show,
to devise and learn. Briefly it is as follows:
with some approach to truth, where the gold
"Middle C to F a Fifth below. F to B flat a for which we are all hunting may most prob-
Fourth above. B flat to E flat a Fifth below, ably be found.
test with middle C a major Sixth. E flat to A
While on the subject, however, I might say
flat a Fourth above, test with middle C a major two things. One is that there is still time for
Third. A flat to D flat a Fifth below, test more contributions; and if any reader has any-
with F a major Third and B flat a major Sixth. thing to tell, let him speak; and speak before
D flat to G flat ( F # ) a Fourth above, test with the first of October, after which day I shall,
E flat a major Third. F # to B a Fourth above. for a season, pigeon-hole temperament argu-
B to E a Fifth below, test with G # a major ments. The other is that 1 hope nobody else
Third. E to A a Fourth above, test with F a made the absurd mistake of which one eminent
major Third or C a minor Third. A to D a critic was guilty with regard to myself and the
Fifth below, test with F # a major Third and method 1 _ have proposed for practical tuning
a major Sixth. D to G a Fourth above, test of temperament; namely, of omitting to read my
with E flat and B major Thirds and C a Fourth. preliminary explanation and then supposing that
G to C a Fifth below. I have said nothing I did not know the mathematical basis of equal
about the speed of the beats per second of the temperament well enough to multiply by the
various intervals, as this has been fully ex- right factor. Seeing, however, that both in the
plained by the editor.
My final test of the Technical Department and in foreign journals
temperament is the comparison of the major I have repeatedly set forth the facts and fig-
Thirds and Sixths through the octave beginning ures accurately to several places of decimals,
with lower C.
perhaps readers generally will believe me when
"I do not use chord tests very much, but con- I assure them that I am not wholly destitute
fine myself mostly to open intervals such as of mathematical knowledge.
C—E flat—C, C—E—C, C—F—C, C—G—C,
I felt I had to get that wail off my chest;
C—A flat—C, C—A—C. As I approach the ex- with due apologies to the eminent Jerseyman
tremes of the scale I use more extended inter- aforesaid, I may now gracefully subside.
vals, as the Tenth, double octave, double octave
and Third. These intervals have simple ratios
A NOTE ON DISTINCTIONS
and errors are more easily detected.
Before
Apropos of this same topic, which has ex-
leaving the piano I give the whole scale some
tests that I consider pretty severe. My motto cited us all during the past weeks, may I make
is: Make the last job the best one. I wish a simple suggestion regarding the best manner
to express my personal appreciation of the arti- of approaching any technical discussion? It is
cles by Mr. Payson, Mr. Manning, Mr. Ingalls that the distinction between Science and Art
and others. I wish we might hear from O. C. be always kept in mind. In our special line of
Faust.
Respectfully, A. F. Atkin, Bowling work we have, of course, the Science of tun-
ing; which means the whole body of physical
Green, O."
facts, systematized until general conclusions
can be accurately drawn from them. We also
NEARING THE HOME STRETCH
have the Art of tuning; which means the prac-
The great symposium nears its end, and it is tical application of the scientific rules to the
already possible to take a general view of it practical end of tuning a piano. The distinc-
and of the facts which have been disclosed. tion is manifest; but many highly intelligent
There remain, however, several valuable con- men habitually confuse the two.
tributions still unpublished. Mr. Manning of-
Such confusion is not only unfortunate; it
OUR TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
We Depend Upon Quality
We rely on the quality of our pianos and players
to bring us more business. Consequently, every
instrument that goes out of this factory is carefully
inspected so that we can be certain it will give full
satisfaction.
Under this policy, our progress has been steady.
Every dealer who handles our line has become a warm
friend of this house. Artistic pianos at fair prices,
combined with square treatment, always win.
Kindler & Collins
^Newjfork
destroys all possibility of agreement with others
who have rightly seen the distinction involved.
When I am discussing the Science of tuning, I
am bound to set forth the physical facts in their
true mathematical relations, no matter how rec-
ondite these become. If I state a mathematical
fact to less than the required number of deci-
mal places, I must explain my inaccuracy; and
justify it. But I must not allow it to be sup-
posed that it is not an inaccuracy, however al-
lowable.
Per contra, when I am discussing the Art of
tuning, my data are not alone the scientific
facts, but also the human ability to make use
of them. I have to deal with the human tuner
as well as with scientific material that tuner has
to use. Therefore,, from the beginning, I am
compelled to allow for a variable factor; and
an independent variable at that. Accuracy, in
the scientifice sense, is then possible, or even
legitimate, only in proportion to the observed
ability of the tuner to express it.
If the tuner were dealing with instruments of
precision the case would be different. But he
is dealing with an instrument of extreme crude-
ness—the piano. It is in failing to remember
this that the academic critic sometimes goes
wrong. If the tuner, for instance, could tune
by the optical method of Lissajous, or by the
clock-tuning-fork method of Koenig, the result
would be scientifically more accurate; but only
in so far as the mechanical construction of the
piano permitted the tensioning of the string ac-
curately. Yet, even so, the tuner would be no
better off, but worse off. He is compelled to
tune commercially; to do a piano in such and
such a time. Hence, once more, all his condi-
tions are rough and inaccurate. He cannot alter
them, no matter how earnestly he may desire
to do so.
Therefore, when I am writing about the Art
of tuning, I must write from the standpoint of
the Art, not from the Standpoint of the Sci-
ence. Suppose, for example, that I make the
mistake of telling a tuner, in an attempt to in-
struct him as to the best way of setting tem-
perament, that he must tune a certain Fifth nar-
row by .58 of one beat per second, the E. T.
beat rate of the Fifth F2—C s at international
pitch.
Now, what exactly does this imply?
First it implies that he is tuning precisely to
the pitch Cs=258.65, which in turn implies both
that his tuning fork is accurate, and also that
he can tune accurately a string to it; all assump-
tions of considerable doubtfulness. Second, that
rate can only be counted as a whole number,
to be accurate, which implies the counting of
58 beats in 100 seconds; which is absurd (a)
because the tone of the piano does not last long
enough, and (b) because to count accurately
over such long intervals of time requires special
training, and a repetition of the experiment for
every error noted, together with careful com-
parison between at least two observers, to allow
for personal equation of error, and a final strik-
ing of the mean between all the observed re-
sults.
In a word, the thing is ridiculous. Science is
the basis of Art; but Science is not Art. Art
is the application of Science; but Art does not
reach the level of Science. Science is abstract,
Art is concrete. Science deals with Universals;
Art with Particulars.
Therefore, if instead of telling a man to try
the obviously impossible task of estimating ac-
curately a rate of 58 beats in 100 seconds, I
give him a metronome, set it to beat 69 times
per minute, and then set the bell to ring every
second strike, telling him to tune till his beat-
rate is equivalent to the bell-rate of the metron-
ome; I am talking good practical talk, based on
Science, but accommodated to the possibilities
of Art. In short, I am talking sense; not non-
sense. The metronome idea, by the way, which
I have used successfully, was suggested by
August Reisig, of New Orleans.
Communications for this department should
be addressed to William Braid White, care The
Music Trade Review, 373 Fourth avenue, New
York City, N. Y.

Download Page 15: PDF File | Image

Download Page 16 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.