Music Trade Review

Issue: 1896 Vol. 22 N. 24

Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
VOL XXII.
No. 24.
Published Every Saturday at 3 East Fourteenth Street. New York, July 4,1896.
In The West.
The Law and trie Creditor.
TAPPER IN THE SHERIFF'S HANDS A REPLEVIN
SUIT THE EVERETT-BENT INFRINGE-
MENT SUIT GLEANINGS.
SOME REMARKS WHICH ARE PREGNANT WITH
COMMON SENSE—-THE PRESENT SYSTEM
OF CREDITS PLACES A PREMIUM
ON DISHONESTY.
P
ETER TAPPER, a manufacturer of
pianos, at 30 West Randolph street,
confessed judgment last Saturday in favor
of Wessell, Nickel & Gross for $810. A
Deputy Sheriff levied on Tapper's shop,
but found only a tew unfinished pianos
whose value would not satisfy the judgment.
Lyon, Potter & Co. are defendants in a
replevin suit brought by H. C. Jenks, a
money lender. The piano, a Vose, was
sold on the installment plan to a man
named Sullivan some time ago, and he
turned it over to Jenks as collateral for
money borrowed. Lyon, Potter & Co.
seized the instrument, having a prior
claim, hence the replevin suit. The case
is one of interest, inasmuch as it will de-
cide whether mortgaged property can be
resold without the consent of the mort-
gagor.
I. N. Reed, of 327 Wabash avenue, will,
in future, represent the Doll piano in this
city. He has purchased the balance of the
Rintelman stock, I understand, for cash.
The suit of the John Church Co. against
Geo. P. Bent for infringement of patents,
was before the United States Circuit Court
last week. Decision will not be rendered
before next October.
I understand that the assignee of the D.
H. Smith Music Co., an off-shoot of the
Wheelock concerns, has paid the creditors
a dividend of 10 per cent.
C. H. Winton, representative of the Mc-
Phail Piano Co., Boston, is sojourning in
this city.
The Russell Piano Co. must be busy, for
they have been fined $50 for violating the
smoke ordnance. I wish there was more
smoke from all the factory chimneys. It
would indicate more business.
A report from the West states that an at-
tachment has been issued against A. L.
Bancroft, of San Francisco, for $9,600.
The members of the music trade in this
city are taking an active interest in the
concerts to be held next Saturday, July 4th,
for the Root Monument Fund. Prominent
members of the trade have testified their
interest in their success by securing boxes.
HERE was once a time when the debtor
had no rights under the law. In an-
cient Rome he could be killed and his body
divided among his creditors. During the
middle ages he could be compelled to work
out his indebtedness, becoming, in fact, a
slave. Imprisonment for debt endured up
to the first quarter of the present century.
But the feeling that the honest debtor was
not and should not be treated as a criminal
even if unable to pay, has so affected mod-
ern legislation that through the efforts to
preserve the rights of the honest debtor the
creditor has been made the sufferer; the
safeguards intended to preserve the debtor
from persecution have become the protec-
tion of the criminal insolvent and operate
against the collections of just claims from
those who are able to pay, but will not.
A man seeks credit and bases his plea
for it on the fact that he possesses certain
property. This is often the sole reason
why he receives any consideration from the
credit department. How often does it
happen that his property is transferred by
some legal fiction just before his failure is
announced. Yet it is so difficult to attack
this sort of a transaction that in very few
cases is any attempt made to set it aside.
For this condition of affairs the debtor is
not wholly to blame. A premium is placed
upon dishonesty by the eagerness of firms
to sell. If a man offers the fact that he
owns real estate to the extent of $20,000 as
a basis for a line of credit to the extent of
$10,000, he might be asked to secure the
firm by a mortgage to that amount; but he
would not do it, because he can always find
some one to trust him, no matter hpw
shady his past commercial record may have
been, or how evident his lack of experience
in the business in which he proposed to en-
gage.
The injury that these men do is not con-
fined to those whom they owe. Their hon
est competitors suffer as well, remarks the
Apparel Gazette, very properly. Of a
recent failure it was said that the debtor
had made at least $40,000 by his settlement.
Was, in short, that much better off than if
T
$3.00 PER YEAR-
SINGLE COPIES, 10 CENTS
he had paid his debts, yet his creditors ac-
cepted his offer, partly because they had to,
or else enter upon expensive litigation, and
partly because they hoped he would buy
other goods, which he would pay for. The
best friend the honest merchant has is the
jobber or manufacturer who scans credits
and forces payment to the full of his ac-
counts; is slow to accept settlements except
at 100 cents on the dollar, and refuses to
sell an)' firm that owes him on old accounts.
If all wholesalers would act on these rules,
business would be less of a game of chance,
in which the brainy, conscienceless mer-
chant has so big an advantage of the man
who tries to pay what he owes. The
credit man is usually the most berated per-
son about a wholesale house, yet if the re-
tailer would believe it, he is the best friend
he has. So far as he can, he stands out
for commercial morality. And it is a pity
that he cannot have his way more often
than he does.
They Handle the Sterling and
Huntington.
N last week's REVIEW, in referring to the
instruments handled by Lyon, Potter
& Co., no reference was made to two makes
of pianos which are exceedingly popular
with that great Western house, and with
which they have had phenomenal success
since handling. We refer to the Sterling
and Huntington pianos. Both of these in-
struments are sold largely by Lyon, Potter
& Co.
I
Spellman Appointed.
N June 30th, Judge Beach, of the
Supreme Court, appointed John H.
Speliman Receiver of the Muehlfeld &
Haynes Piano Co. This settles definitely
the matter which has been pending for
some time, and the Receiver will take pos-
session of the corporation's affairs imme-
diately. The Muehlfeld & Haynes Co.
some weeks ago requested the appointment
of W. F. Boothe as assignee. The appoint-
ment of Mr. Boothe was objected to by
some of the creditors, with the result as
stated above.
O
THE firm of Geo. Jardine & Son, organ
builders, has been reorganized. The new
firm will carry on the business under the
same firm name.
Music Trade Review -- © mbsi.org, arcade-museum.com -- digitized with support from namm.org
THE MUSIC TRADE REVIEW.
- ^ . E D W A R D L\MAN
Editor and Proprietor.
PUBLISHED
EVERY
SATURDAY
3 East 14th St.. New York
SUBSCRIPTION (including postage) United States and
Canada, $3.00 per year; Foreign Countries, $4.00.
ADVERTISEMENTS, $2.00 per inch, single column, per
Insertion. On quarterly or yearly contracts. special dis-
count ta allowed.
REMITTANCES, in other than currency form, should
0* made payable to Edward Lyman Bill.
Bntered at the New York Post Office as Second-Class Matter.
NEW YORK, JULY 4, 1896
TELEPHONE NUMBER 1745. — EIGHTEENTH STREET.
••THE BUSINESS MAN'S PAPER."
THE NECESSITY \FOR PROTECTION
LL fair-minded men — men w h o
rigidly adhere to lines of decency,
of honor, of truth and of self-respect—
need not carefully study the statutes in
order that they may not overstep the divid-
ing line between honesty and dishonesty.
They are governed by a certain feeling or
principle which we are prone to designate
as conscience. If all men possessed this
human attribute to even an ordinary
degree, there would be no need or necessity
for making our statute books overcumber-
some by steadily adding to their size and
unwieldiness.
The same rules apply to every sub-divi-
sion of employment in life. Business men
who conduct establishments make them-
selves respected and their names of weight
in the commercial world by adhering to
certain lines of principle and honor in the
conduct o( their affairs, so that they fairly
earn the respect and esteem of their con-
stituency.
Do they consult the statute books in or-
A
der that they may conduct their business
honestly ?
No. They are governed by conscience,
and what in the innermost depths of their
heart they consider to be the principles of
honor.
It is true there are instances wherein
men have overstepped those lines unknow-
ingty and unwillingly as well.
It is true also there is a class of men who
endeavor by certain sharp practices to gain
supremacy in their own peculiar walks in
life. Sometimes these methods succeed
temporarily. And again, men run the
whole gamut of life without once being
called to account.
The same laws and variations apply to
every sub-division in the commercial, and
we may add, in the journalistic world, hav-
ing as a sub-division of the latter—trade
journalism.
In the latter we find men who adhere to
certain lines which they believe fair, equit-
able and just. These by the conduct of
their business on legitimate lines have
fairly earned the right to the esteem of the
particular trades of which they are expo-
nents.
Unfortunately, this class as in the busi-
ness world, is invaded by men who seek
under the misapplied name of journalism to
carry on certain unfair, dishonorable and
oftentimes dishonest operations. Their
works have had an effect to taint what other
wise would be the pure stream of journalism.
Journalism, like manufacturing, is in it-
self a noble enterprise, but it has its abuses
as well as uses. But take as in the case of
the self-respecting business man, the honest
journalist does not consult the statutes of
the country or the mandates of any particu-
lar body of men. Why?
He conducts his business fairly, he is
guided by that inner consciousness—that
is, he is working on correct lines. Know-
ing this, and strong in his own convictions,
he works on for the right regardless of the
storms which beat around him, or the reso-
lutions which may have been passed to ex-
ercise a certain censorship over his craft.
He realizes, as in the case of statutes,
that all men are not fair men; that all men
are not honest men; therefore, it is neces-
sary to make laws for the law breakers and
to see that they are enforced for the protec-
tion of society.
Laws are not primarily made in a re-
vengeful spirit, they are made for the pro-
tection of society against evil doers; thus
we may consider that the resolutions of the
New York Association were passed not as
a menace to trade journalism, not as an in-
terference with the legitimate functions of
a paper, but as a matter of protection for
its members against the unwarrantable, in-
solent and dishonest methods which have
obtained in the past.
Is it not a wise protection?
We say most emphatically, yes.
This is precisely the position we have
taken unqualifiedly from the start. We,
with others, believe in honest, free,
independent trade journalism. We do not
believe in the supplicating, or in the men-
dicant style. We believe that journalism
when run on dignified lines dignifies the
trade which it represents.
We have expressed ourselves in no un-
equivocal language regarding this matter,
and propose to the end to work on the same
lines to which we have closely adhered for
many years.
We never have hesitated to speak boldly
concerning any trade or firm. We never
have hesitated in the slightest when the
occasion has arisen for criticising work of
any one engaged in our particular field of
journalism when their work or expression
deserved censure. In fact, we have always
exercised a degree of fearless independence.
Possibly others may criticise our work.
They have that right and privilege.
If we interpret correctly the meaning of
the Association's resolutions, it is not to
bring to trial a publisher for alleged
offenses committed m the past, but that
the resolutions are to apply to any act
which a conductor of a trade paper may
make in the future which is offensive to
any member of the Association.
With this clearly in view we say this,
would not some of our contemporaries do
well by refraining from their attacks upon
the paper which they directly accuse of
being the cause of the action of the Associ-
ation?
Granting that this may be tiue, then
why not, as journalists, accept the ruling
of the Association in the same broad spirit
in which it is given and let the dead past
bury its dead. In other words, why rake over
the dying embers of the past to fan into
life some alleged offense committed years
ago?
It might be well for the one who is loud-
est in his denunciations of the past record
of the alleged offending paper to halt—to
consider that if the Association were to try
trade paper editors on their past record,
that about the first thing necessary here in
New York would be the purchase of a com-
petent disinfectant in large quantities.
The re-publication of the life of one of
those who is loudest, most persistent in his
abuse and mouthings would certainly not
read pleasant in all its varied phases, and

Download Page 3: PDF File | Image

Download Page 4 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.