Mechanical Memories Magazine

Issue: 2006-April - Issue 1

First, the trigger. Why bother? Why not just have the player insert his coin at the top of the
machine and let it bounce around a few pins and find it's own path? Well, by allowing the
player to fire his coin, he is deluded into thinking he has some control. And if he thinks he
has control, he'll apply that old addage ' practice makes perfect'. This is the first rule of
encouraging repeat play: ' let the punter think he can beat the machine'! In reality of coarse,
the player has very little control, although with practice he would probably stand a better
chance. The good news for the operater was that the amount of money a player would
need to spend in order to get some sort of 'feel' with the trigger, would more than
sufficiantly pay for the odd 'good cigar' he might win!
Second, by giving the player 'control' it could be interpreted as 'skill' . This was to be
an extremely important element in future machine design. As the automatics industry grew
through the 1890s and into the twentieth century, the authorities became increasingly
ant oanistic toward games of chance.
Early Tivoli, Haydon and Urry Ltd c. !890s
Page 7
So, the Tivoli set the standard for future design of gaming wall machines. In order to be
accepted as ' legal', a machine had to demonstrate a degree of 'skill ' . The line between
skill and chance was never clearly defined; neither would it have been easy to do so. The
element of skill was certainly dubious in many machines to come.
As a measure of Tivoli's success, over forty patents relating to the game were taken
out over almost as many years. But the game didn't drastically change; rather, it evolved.
The cigar payout was replaced with a token payout quite early in the machine's
development, and jackpots were to come later. It wasn't until the 1930s that a new drop
case machine would oust everything that had gone before, and remain in British arcades
for another forty years.
In 1931 , Leslie Bradley in conjuction with The Perry Barr Metal Co. Ltd, took out
patent No. 3 77316 for the Challenger. This was to be the second, and indeed the last,
significant development in the Drop Case machine .
. ::;;;.:.:-:: ?~~· ~::-.
.... ,«.e, ... ,....... .
.--oe, ...... ,
>J
~..t·
, ~-:~~~~-;~~~~j . -~·-· .~ . . ,;
Bradley's I 9 3 I challenger (sorry this is such a crap picture - it 's the best I could find)
Page 8

Download Page 7: PDF File | Image

Download Page 8 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.