Coin Slot

Issue: 1981 January 071

Coin Slot Magazine - #071 - 1981 - January [International Arcade Museum]
Dear Editor,
Enclosed are the pictures and Serial Numbers of two of my
machines I cannot identify and wonder if you could help.
Both are Jennings. The orange front has a very unusual cog
— probably a 1926 OPERA TOR BELL (covered in Coin Slot
Guide No. 17) — but thefront is upfor grabs. Here's why. Rock-
Ola made over a dozen different jackpot fronts for all sorts of
Bell machines, and we can't tell which one from your descrip
wheel attached to the mechanism with a keeper which regulates
tion.
the amount of money going into the jack pot. (Also fortune
That Coin Slot Guide will help you fix up and maintain the
machine, and there's a later Coin Slot Guide No. 70 (it won't be
reels).
The other machine has no unusual feature but cannot find it in
any book. Thanks. Will be sending all of my numbers soon.
out until late 1981) that'll cover the jackpot. So what you need
now is Coin Slot Guide No. 17.
Asfor identifying theparticular Rock-Olafront, it'll be in one
Name withheld.
of the three "100 Most Collectible Slot Machines" volumes —
volumes 1 and 2 are available now, and volume 3 will be out in
early 1981.
mtW'-"

• •

Editor
*
Dear Editor,
Have your letter of November 7th and am sorry to learn of
your difficulty in producing the miniature statues. If I am
correct I placed an order for the one-armed Masked Bandit in
the bronze look and the one-armed Cowboy hand painted as
advertised in The Coin Slot. Apologies accepted for your delay
tm0fe'
as
>- :■-.■.
I
imagine
the
project demands
much
expertise
and
craftsmanship. Please find enclosed $25 for which please renew
my subscription to The Coin Slot for 1981. Incidentally have a
..•■:■■
.*-.!
complete set of all The Coin Slot publications from issue #1
September 74 published by Les and Edith Druyan, 681 Sherman
Court, Westbury, NY 11590. Looking forward to receiving the
miniatures, hope they arrive before Christmas. Thanks for your
• (Name withheld by request)
Nice machines! Nice condition! Nice offer to be sending all of
your serial numbers soon for the "Update".
time and attention.
Sincerely,
Alfred Windon
The "ORANGE FRONT', serial 101,827, is the Jennings
NEW VICTORIA "Model B" of 1931. It's literally the same
machine as the exhaulted "Black Cat I Witch Front" of 1930 but
somewhat more sedate in design to bring it into the thirties and
the Art Deco period. All that funny machinery you mention is
the VICTORIA system of regulating the jackpot contents. It'll
all be explained in Coin Slot Guide No. 42 for the Jennings
VICTORIA which is fairly soon forthcoming.
The other machine is the Jennings JACK-POT "Blue Boy",
only you can't tell it with its replacement jackpot front. That
front is the way they upgraded the old "Blue Boy", serial 67,812
and brought it into the twin jackpot age. It's the National TWIN
JA CKPOT made in Toledo, Ohio and it's explained in detail in
the Volume 3 "An Illustrated Price Guide to the 100 Most
Collectible Slot Machines", now at the printer.
Hang on, your machines will be in books soon.
The Editor,
— NOTICE -
Jukebox Junction, Inc. wishes to
announce the purchase of the entire
stock of reproduction parts and litera
ture of the Classic Jukebox Company of
Reseda, California. It is our intention to
continue to produce and make available
those items which meet our standards,
always improving quality where
possible.
slot machine which has oak sides, a small owl embossed on top
While the Classic Jukebox Company
will no longer be selling reproduction
parts and literature, they will still do
and a 1776 Liberty Bell beneath the goose neck coin slot. I have
restoration work and sell original parts.
Dear Editor,
I have recently purchased a Rock-Ola Mfg. Co. table model
no idea of its age, but would appreciate any information you
might have concerning parts, repair manuals, award cards, etc.
for such a machine.
Enclosed is an sase for our reply should you be able
to help
.com
m
:
me. Thank you.
u
m
e
Sincerely,
d fro de-mus
e
d
a
J.J. Johnson
a
o
wnl ww.arc
o
D
Dear J.J.,
w
p:// of
Wow, it's
hard to help you with that one from your
htt kind
We will be happy to address any in
quiries you may have concerning your
future needs for reproduction parts and
literature.
Jukebox Junction, Inc.
P.O. Box 1081
Des Moines, Iowa 50311
(515) 981-4019
description. First ofall, your machine is a Mills Bell ofsome sort
JANUARY, 1981
© The International Arcade Museum
THE COIN SLOT — 9
http://www.arcade-museum.com/
Coin Slot Magazine - #071 - 1981 - January [International Arcade Museum]
What Is An
"Antique
Slot
Machine"?
In his 1979 publication, An Il
lustrated Price Guide to the 100 Most
Collectible Slot Machines - Volume 2,
Richard M. Bueschel, in a truly out
standing job of research, provides a
review of "Slot Machine Collectible
Laws" State by state. One of the
categories in this review is entitled,
"Description
of
Antique
Slot."
California
Law Does Not
Define
"Antique
Quaere, whether Bueschel inten
tionally chose to use the word
"Description" rather than the word
"Definition."
According to Funk & Wagnall,
"description" is that which gives a
verbal account of something; that
which gives a mental picture or idea
Slot Machine".
of something; that which is a por
trayal of something in words; whereas
"definition" is the act of stating what a
word, phrase, or set of terms means; it
is the state of being clearly outlined or
determined; it is a determination
which is precise or explicit.
I suspect that Bueschel intentional
ly chose the word "description" rather
than "definition," because none of the
statutes
and
their
amendments
reviewed by Bueschel state precisely
or explicitly the type of slot machine
which
can
be
"possessed"
or
by
"collected" without violating certain
criminal or tax laws of a given state.
Bueschel notes this problem with
regard to certain statutes: Colorado -
Louis J. Fischl
"Any date provided not used for
gambling but not clearly defined"
(emphasis added); Connecticut -
"Any date provided not used for
Member
State Bar Of
California
Professor Of
gambling but not clearly defined"
(emphasis added); Michigan - "Any
date provided not used for gambling
but not clearly defined" (emphasis
added).
While
Bueschel
has
correctly
labeled some of the statutes as not
clearly defining an "antique" slot, it
can be contended that all of the
applicable statutes fail, not only to
define CLEARLY an "antique" slot
machine, but also fail to provide ANY
definition
of
an
"antique"
slot
machine.
Some of the "descriptions" raise
interesting issues. For example, in
Mississippi, Nevada, and Ohio the
Business,
San Jose State
University
Recently we received a court transcript
which made our whole staff stop, reread
and then ask questions. We found some
answers, but we were not satisfied. We
took our unanswerable portion of the
puzzle to Louis J. Fischl, a noted attorney
and collector in California.
By way of a little background - a retail
slot machine store was opened in New
port Beach, California. Some of the
machines which were offeredfor sale had
"description" permits ownership of
any slot machine, regardless of date
a great deal of recasting - primarily of
parts of the cases. It seems that a problem
arose as to whether these particular
machines were "restored" or "reproduc
tions". Keep in mind that the mechanisms
.com
m
u
e
:
rom -mus
f
d
e
strips.
oad .arcade
l
n
The upshot
police con
Dow // is w that
ww 20 the machines.
fiscated approximately
The
:
judge ruled
htt in p favor of the proprietor and
were essentially original - minor new
parts being used such as springs and reel
Mr. Fischl gives us a great deal offoodfor
thought in his analysis of the case.
10 — THE COIN SLOT
© The International Arcade Museum
of manufacture, provided it is not
operated for profit. Does this mean
that such a machine can be used for
gambling purposes as long as the
pay-out is 100% (i.e., without profit to
the owner)? Or does this mean that
such a machine cannot be used for
any purpose which provides the
POSSIBILITY of a profit to anyone
(i.e., owner or player)? The descrip
tion under Minnesota's law covers
any slot machine, regardless of the
date of manufacture, provided it is not
used for gambling and provided it is
"inoperable."
Is
a
machine
"inoperable" when it will not accept a
coin? When the handle will not func
tion? When the reels will not turn?
When the pay-off mechanism will not
function? Just what IS an inoperable
machine? Is it one which isTOTALLY
inoperable - i.e., one without any
moving parts whatsoever??? The
description under New Hampshire's
law
covers
any
slot
machine,
regardless of date of manufacture,
provided it is "for personal amuse
ment only." The possible meanings
here are limitless, and Bueschel
remarks, "Law needs clarification." A
very polite understatement!
Most of the more common descrip
tions in other statutes fall into two
categories: (1) those which permit the
collection
of any slot machine,
regardless of date of manufacture,
provided it is not used for gambling;
and (2) those which permit the collec
tion of any slot machine manufac
tured prior to a specified date (e.g.,
1941) or manufactured a specified
number of years ago (e.g. 25 years
ago or earlier, provided it is not used
for gambling. The first type of
description is the most desirable,
basically, for two reasons: Even the
most
recently
manufactured
machines represent, in the minds of
many, characteristics (e.g., art work,
mechanical functioning, electronic
curio) which give rise to their collec-
tibility. Of utmost importance is the
simplicity of such a description. The
key word is "gambling," and that is
reasonably well defined in most
jurisdictions. This avoids the problem
of having to interpret such words as
"antique" or "manufactured."
The specific problem to which this
article is addressed is the typical
ambiguity of those statutes in the
second
category
(above)
which
legalize the collection of machines
manufactured prior to a certain date
or manufactured a specified number
of years. The California statute
will be used as a point of reference,
and a 1979 California case will be
used to illustrate the problems which
collectors may
the legality of
collections.
It
is
not
legislature of a
have in substantiating
certain items in their
uncommon
for the
state to use a key word
in a statute without defining it. For
example, under Section 2-302 of the
Uniform Commercial Code of Califor
nia, the court may refuse to enforce
an "unconscionable" contract for the
sale of goods. The Code does not
define
"unconscionable".
Unlike
many terms used in legislation, this
JANUARY, 1981
http://www.arcade-museum.com/

Download Page 9: PDF File | Image

Download Page 10 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.