Coin Slot

Issue: 1980 January 059

Coin Slot Magazine - #059 - 1980 - January [International Arcade Museum]
"Oldies but Goodies"
(Next 15 pages)
It's time the laws were changed
by Richard M. Bueschel,
author of the forthcoming book
LEMONS, CHERRIES AND BELL-FRUIT-GUM
An affectionate technical, social and business history of the mechanical,
coin-operated gaming machine: the slot machine, or "One-Armed Ban
dit" (Vestal Press, scheduled for December 1975)
If you had a uniquely American machine from the late 19th Century, or
the first half of the 20th Century that was beautiful in design, workman
ship and operation; had its own specific place in the history of American
science and technology; had made a major contribution to American
social and commercial history; exemplified American know-how to the
whole world; and one that you had lovingly restored to working order by
yourself, could you keep it ? The answer isn't an easy yes or no. All
you can say is, "It depends, " on what ? Well, it depends on what it is.
If it was an antique automobile, you!d probably be written up in the local
.newspaper as a technical historian, and asked to participate in Memorial
Day Parades. If it was an antique airplane, you'd be well known at anti
que fly-ins and be respected as a mechanical genius. If it was an antique
typewriter, washing machine, shotgun, steam engine, cannon, locomo
tive, camera or juke box, you!d be regarded as someone who had a keen
Understanding of the technological advances of our age, and a historian
to boot.
But, o. If it was a slot machine, you've broken the law I
What kinds of laws are these that permit all American mechanical anti
ques the priviledge of being rediscovered, cared for, restored and pre
served for posterity with the exception of one class of machine ? In a
word: Repressive I
And why do these laws exist at all ? To prevent gambling ? Hardly 1
It's illogical that the citizens living in the many states that raise public
funds through state lotteries, or permit off-track betting, or have open
racing seasons, would be protected against gambling in any way, shape
or form by laws that prohibit the private ownership of antique gaming
machines. For one thing, private ownership of gaining machines would
keep them out of public's hands. The public would rarely see them, or
only see them as often as they might see antique cars, airplanes, or
typewriters. So why do these repressive local, state and Federal laws
exist ?
Quite possibly the answer is the simple one that nobody has gotten around
to changing the old prohibitions now that there no longer is any need for
them. If that's the case, it's time some tiling was done about it. The
whole matter of the ownership and display of mechanical gaming machi
nes is ridden with inconsistencies, inequalities, and needless repression.
It should be straightened out, clarified, and lennlized.
.com
m
:
u
m
e
d fro de-mus
e
d
a we should
First of all;
a few things. We're P°t talking about
n ! lo We're
arca clarify
. talking
w
gambling
about the appreciation and restoration of valid
o
w
D
w
American :/ mechanical
antiques. We're asking for the legal right to restore
/w
and display
http antiques that only happen to have a gambling feature. Yet that
© The International Arcade Museum
12
http://www.arcade-museum.com/
Coin Slot Magazine - #059 - 1980 - January [International Arcade Museum]
applies only if they are operated as gambling devices 1 There's an impor
tant distinction here. It's what People do witn machines that make them
troublesome. For instance, an antique revolver could be used in a hold
up, but the person using the gun is culpable, not the gun. Yet as an anti
que without criminal use, the gun can be owned, and displayed. An anti
que sports car could be used for a getaway in a robbery. The robbers
would be the criminals, not the car. The car, if not criminally used, is
a valid antique, and can be exhibited, and driven. But here's where the
inconsistencies come in. Anyone that has a slot machine is automatically
a criminal by virture of machine ownership, whether it works or not. In
most states it is illegal to own a slot machine. Federal laws now on the
books make it illegal to ship slot machines across state lines without
government approval, no matter what the age or condition* FBI and state
"busts" of collectors and antique dealers buying, selling, trading and im
porting such machines are occurring with increasing frequency. It is even
illegal in some areas to reproduce or distribute the well-known slot mach
ine fruit symbols in spite of their use in national advertising and printing.
While there has been a so-called Sexual Revolution (you can discuss just
about everything now, even have it printed or filmed), there has obviously
been no Slot Machine Revolution. To have a machine is to gamble illegally
in the eyes of the law in most states. The law in the state of Illinois is
typical. Article 28 of the Illinois Criminal Code (28-l-a-3) states "A
person commits gambling when he: operated, keeps, owns, uses, purcha
ses, exhibits, rents, sells, bargains for the sale or lease of, manufac
tures or distributes any gambling device ", and (29-5-a) "every gambling
device which is uncapable of lawful use is contraband and shall be subject
to seizure, confiscation and destruction... (which) includes any slot
machine, and includes any machine or device constructed for the recep
tion of money or other thing of value and so constructed as to return on
chance to the player thereof money, property or a right to receive money
or property ."
The major fallacy in the whole legal concept of prohibiting the private
collecting and display of mechanical gaming machines is the alleged conn
ection with gambling. People who collect slot machines (Yes--there are
collectors, in spite of the enormous legal difficulties) don't use thenffor
gambling* For one thing, they don't like to have their treasured machines
used too often. It wears them out. and tilings can go wrong. Secondly,
there is no possible way to make money at it; The depreciation of money, *
and the many expensive service calls*needed to keep the machine working,
would cost more than the take. Maybe, back in the twenties or thirties,
unscrupulous operators (and even then most of them were honest business
men 1) could make the slots turn a good dollar through muscle and multi
ple locations. But there's no way that a machine, or two, or ten, or twe
nty in a basement or game room could begin to pay their way. True, the
real devotee wants the machines to work, and generally provides a bowl
of coins (If you're really into it, they'll be Liberty Head nickels! ) so
they can be played. But it's house money I I've never met a collector—
and I've met many—that ever made money on their gaming machines.
Entertainment, yes I Income, no I
.com
m
:
u
from -muse
d
e
As for inequalities
ade the law, there are many, and all against the
oad .a under
l
c
r
n
private
For instance, a beautifully restored Caille NEW CENTURY
w
Dow owner.
w
DETROIT
is
on display in a simulated 19th century street in the Detroit
w
/
/
:
City Museum.
The law apparently closes its eyes to the museum, but a
http
Gambling isn't the attraction to the collector, anyway. It's the machines
themselves.
private collector In Detroit having the same machine faces the prospect of
© The International Arcade Museum
13
http://www.arcade-museum.com/

Download Page 14: PDF File | Image

Download Page 15 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.