Coin Slot Location

Issue: 1984-January - Vol.Num 4 Issue 1

Location-Thirty-eight
Despite a short post war boom in the automatic field
things went very badly for the parent Mills company.
Important deals relating to the manufacture of
Coca-Cola vending machines , and juke boxes
specifically the Panorama which incorporated a film
cassette unit were badly mismanaged , resulting in great
financial loss to the company. By 1948 although still
solvent Mills Industries was experiencing great
difficulties in meeting its obligations. It was put into a
protracted state of receivership and in 1954 was finally
liquidated. As Fred Mills later explained: " We were
forced into Chapter Eleven bankruptcy and lost
propriety to the products and the patents. We had to
shrink everything down to liquidate. The guy who was
brought in to do the job was ruthless , he just got rid of
everything , the huge factory premises , ail the fine
equipment. The people who bought it stripped it-down
and made about $2,000,000. In 1941 the business had
been valued at $10,000,000. It was a great shame ,_ a
a great loss" . Despite the demise of the parent
company the Bell-O-Matic Corporation managed to
survive and prosper in the bleak years to corne .
As this instance shows the late 1940s and early 1950s,
despite an initial post war boom , were to be no golden
age for the manufacturers. A new wave of
anti-gambling fervour swept the nation following
investigations into racketeering , but in many ways
fostered by the rising, ultra conservative McCarthyist
ascendancy in America. A Federal Bill was proposed
which among other things sought to ban the interstate
shipment of gambling machines-a move disastrous in
its implications to the manufacturing industry .
In response to this the industry united in December
1949 to form the American Coin Machine
Manufacturers' Association , with Herb Jones of the
Bally Manufacturing Company as its president. Its aim
was "to work for the good of the en tire industry" . The
effort was futile . In January 1951 the Johnson Bill
became law. It enacted that any violators of the law
would face a $5,000 fine and two years in prison. The
law effectively made it illegal to manufacture ,
recondition , repair, sell, transport , possess , or use any
gambling device in any land under the exclusive
Federal Jurisdiction. The manufacturers worst fears
had corne true. In February of that year Herb Jones
was quoted by the trade joumals as saying , rather
lamely: "So far as I know ail manufacturers affected by
the bill have already stopped making them . They
stopped last week" . He added that some of the
manufacturers were going into defence production for
the Korean war.
The law also enacted that any state wishing to exempt
itself from the Federal Bill was able to enact a special
law to this end , and thus permit the shipping of gaming
devices into its area. This might have raised some hopes
since two states Nevada and Maryland were to settle for
this option. However they were soon dashed for the
Chicago-based manufacturers following the passing of a
law by the Illinois State Legislature prohibiting ail out
of state shipments. As a token of defeat the short lived
American Coin Machine Manufacturers' Association
was dissolved to a backdrop of intensive F.B.I. activity
against unlawful interstate trafficking of machines.
The Chicago based manufacturing companies that
could not move had no option but to switch to new
production lines or go out of business. The 1950s
therefore were very lean years for the automatic
gambling machine in America with few companies of
any note left in the manufacturing field .
In 1931 the State Legislature of Nevada had passed a
bill which legalised ail forms of gambling , except
lottery , within the state. It was passed at a time when
the minerai mines , which were the main industry in the
state, had become uneconomic due to the depression .
The new law was seen as a way of attracting people and
business into the state. In the eyes of the national press
it was seen as an experiment that was bound to fail.
However in the pre-war years the growth of Nevada as
a gambling centre remained retarded , but as the
anti-gambling laws in the rest of America grew
progressively stricter, culminating in the Johnson Act
of 1951 , Nevada and especially the towns of Reno and
Las Vegas became an increasingly attractive
proposition for the diverse elements connected with the
gambling industry. As a consequence its real
development as a national gambling centre dates only
from the immediate post war years. It was in Nevada
1960 JENNINGS BUCKAROO
Location-Thirty-nine
therefore that the manufacture and use of the three
reeler was largely maintained and increasingly
flourished during the lean post war years.
In 1948 the Buckley Manufacturing Company, who had
entered the slot machine field by revamping old Mills
machines during the war, launched a new machine , the
Criss Cross Bell. This machine incorporated a major
new feature which had previously been developed by
the company for use on their revamped models. lt was
the Tic Tac Toe , which as its name suggests made
provision for an extra automatic payout (of 18 coins) if
the three bar symbols appeared oc the reels regardless
of whether they were on the central win line. This
effectively added 12 more winning combinations to the
payout schedule and liberalised the machine , thus
making it more attractive to play. lts appeal also lay fn
its element of surprise , the player happily accepting a
payout when no obvious combination had been made ,
especially since only some of the combinations had
been listed on the award chart. The idea was an
immediate success , especially so in Nevada which at
that time was buying up machines wholesale . lt rapidly
became Buckley's most important trading area , so that
by the time of the Johnson Act the firm had become
firmly entrenched in Nevada and was little affected by
the law's implementation . The feature was of course
taken up by others. In the same year Jennings launched
the Standard Chief Tic Tac Toe Bell. Mills also brought
out a special over-and-under version of the Jewel Bell
which later became the 21 Bell , which featured instead
of bar symbols , the number seven .
MACHINE DESIGN
The rise of Nevada as a centre for gambling led to
changes in machine design . The earliest of these related
to the jackpot. The laws of the state placed no limit
upon the money that could be won from a slot machine
as long as that money was guaranteed and attainable .
To this end machines for the Nevada market were
made which by-passed the conventional automatically
loaded jackpot, enabling them to be either hand
loaded , or to offer sums of money much vaster than any
machine was able to pay out automatically, in which
case the lucky player was paid in cash by the house. The
change in design of the Pace machines of the late 40s is
an instance of this , whereby the traditional twin jackpot
window was dropped in favour of the handloaded
Jumbo Jak-Pot or Guaranteed Jak-Pot windows .
Another instance of how the Nevada market affected
machine design was the introduction by Ace ( one of the
successors of the Pace Manufacturing Company) in the
early 1950s of the front opening cabinet which
facilitated the cleaning and servicing of a machine by
the location. Up until that time access to the
mechanism was solely by means of the back which in
many instances necessitated moving the machine . What
in many respects was a minor innovation led in the long
run to radical changes in the machine's design.
As noted earlier, the response of the industry when
faced with hard times was to seek solutions which
would enable the machines to be used despite the
laws made against them . Although much depleted in
1947 MILLS JEWEL BELL
numbers, the 1950s were to prove no exception to this
rule for manufacturers. This time however the laws
formulated were so strictly worded , and so stringently
applied that the ploys of earlier years proved largely
ineffectual.
In 1953 Taylor and Company of Chicago, an electrical
components manufacturing firm , launched a remote
control electrical unit for use on converted slot
machines. The device's success lay in its questioning of
the legal definition of what constituted a coin-operated
gambling machine . The unit was in fact an updated
version of an earlier ploy, which as already noted had
been tried out some 30 years earlier by such companies
as Eljay in England. If no coin was directly required to
play a machine and no money was directly forthcoming
from the machine , then under the strict letter of the law
it was not a coin-operated gambling device. ln practice
an operator would retain control of the unit . An
intending player would pay him for whatever number
of plays he wished . The operator would then work the
unit so that it released the handle on the machine for
the desired number of plays. The machine could then
be operated in the normal manner. If the player won ,
the operator would pay out (under the counter). No
coin entered or left the machine , on the front of which
invariably appeared the words " For Amusement
Only" . In practice the unit had only a marginal success,
-----------------------------------»

Download Page 40: PDF File | Image

Download Page 41 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.