C.O.C.A. Times

Issue: 2003-March - Vol 1 Num 1

How to Bid on Ebay and Win When You Lose
by Bill Butterfield
It's always exciting for me when I hear about any partic-
ularly scarce piece of Wurlitzer jukebox equipment turn-
ing up. Since my earliest days of collecting I've been
aware that some of the more exotic wall speakers and
remote control items are much harder to find than even
the best Wurlitzer jukeboxes such as the 850 and 950.
Here's a story about why it may pay you to bid on eBay
even if you don't think you have a chance of winning the
item you are bidding on.
in touch with DK to see where he was located. Low and
behold, DK was in Virginia just like TL, about two hours
away from TL's home. So TL scooted right over there
and bought the model 580 speaker, the wallboxes, a lot
of parts and stuff from the garage as well as a Wurlitzer
1900 and AMI 1-200. He even got a butterscotch Catalin
Fada radio for free that was on the pile for the dump ("no
one bought it at the garage sale, so go ahead and take
it").
In October of 2001 I got an email message from a good
friend of mine in Virginia (I'll call him "TL"). TL had
just gotten an email from someone he didn't know (I'll
call this man "DK"). DK's father, who died about 1975,
had been a small jukebox operator in the 1940's and
l 950's. DK's mother had just passed away in September
2001, so he and his two sisters had come home to clear
up an estate "garage sale" and got rid of some junk.
DK's sisters said he could have the old jukebox stuff and
they would take the remaining household furnishings.
True to his word, TL honored his prior arrangement with
me and sold me the 580 speaker at the agreed on price,
even though we both knew it was worth more. I also
bought the 8 model wallboxes (7 had metal covers, and
one had a Catalin cover).
When DK found the wallboxes they were wrapped in
1947 newspapers. The plastics for the speaker had
shrunk and curled up into little clumps so DK had
thrown them away. Original plastics for the 580 almost
always did that, so it was not unusual. Also found with
the speaker in the attic was a small shipping carton from
the Wurlitzer factory with the remains of a broken cen-
ter "tulip" glass for the 580 in it. The clue that the wall-
boxes and wallspeaker all had the same title strips in
them means they came from the same location. From
information garnered from DK's story, it seems that his
father had "inherited" the wallboxes and speaker from a
location he had taken over in the 1940's. DK's father
probably ordered a new replacement glass for the front
of the speaker from Wurlitzer. When it arrived broken,
he got discouraged and put the speaker and wallboxes in
the attic of his house, sometime in 1947, where they sat
for 54 years until his wife died.
Most of the jukeboxes and parts were in the garage.
There was an attic in the house though, and DK found 8
old wallboxes and a big wooden cabinet in the attic. He
found ID tags on them and decided to do some checking
to see what he had. The wallboxes were model 125, and
the big cabinet was a model 580 wall speaker. He had
almost thrown the wall speaker away, since there was no
good plastic or glass in it at all - just the wooden cabinet
and the mechanical works inside.
This is where eBay comes in. DK knew about eBay - he
went to the website and did a search for Wurlitzer wall-
boxes. It just so happened that there was a similar wall-
box being offered on eBay at that time (it was a Catalin
model 120 wallbox that had been bought at the June
2001 Christie's auction in Beverly Hills, which I attend-
ed). DK decided to email each of the people bidding on
this wallbox and see if they wanted to buy the stuff he
had found in his mom's attic. My friend TL was one of
these bidders. So was another friend of mine from
Germany - a prominent Wurlitzer collector - "RA". RA
had gotten very excited about the possibility of buying a
model 580 speaker. Germany is a long way from the east
coast of America though, and got a little leery. He want-
ed to make sure it was an original speaker and not one of
the look-alikes made in the past 20 years. He emailed
DK for more information.'
So it just goes to show, bidding on eBay can be very
good for some people, even if they don't win what they
were bidding on.
TL on the other hand emailed me right away to see what
I would offer. I gave him a reasonable number, so TL got
27
THE GOLF GAME WARS
by Larry Bieza and John Papa
Settling differences over a golf game in court? It
happened this time. Big time game producer
Chester-Pollard of New York vs. little guy Popular
Games Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota. At issue
were the two golf games the companies were mak-
ing. Chester-Pollard (The Golf Game) claimed they
had golf game patents that were infringed on by
Popular Games Inc. (Hoot Mon) game.
On January 18, 1927 Donovan arrived in
Minneapolis to sign a deal with the newly formed
Midwest Amusement Co. The principals of the
company were, Sam Snyder, Odin Norum, Louis
Gross, Benjamin Haskell, and Mr. Goldstein. Al
Walzer was there at the contract signing. Seeing
thousands of dollars changing hands convinced him
to go ahead on his sports game idea - a miniature
golf game. The problem was, Walzer didn't have a
nickel to his name, so he had to find a money man.
He called a U of M classmate, Dr. Steinman.
Steinman was a dentist and had some extra funds,
so Walzer described his idea, probably mentioning
the big football game deal, and Steinman was sold.
In early February, Steinman sent Walzer to a local
patent attorney, where he met Lagaard, an attor-
ney/inventor. Lagaard was intrigued by the idea,
and the two agreed to co-design the game. By May
19, 1927 they had a working prototype and invited
people over to see and play the game. By coinci-
dence, one of Dr. Steinman's patients was Ben
Haskell - one of the original investors in the
Midwest Amusement (now called Midwest Football
Games Co.). Haskell's wife had money to invest, so
with their funding, Walzer, Steinman, and Haskell,
formed Popular Games Inc., setting up at 510 Fifth
Ave. in Minneapolis.
Who won? Not so fast. First, let's give you some
background on one of the more interesting coin-op
court cases.
It all started innocently enough. Sam Snyder, owner
of the Minneapolis Recreation Co., a billiards and
bowling establishment, asked an acquaintance
Louis Gross, to go to Chicago and check out a new
football game advertised by Chester-Pollard. Louis
Gross was an assistant football coach at the U of M,
so the idea of a miniature football game intrigued
him. The promise of being a partner in this new ven-
ture clinched the deal and off he went to Chicago in
December 1926. A friend of Gross', Albert Walzer,
who was on his way to Michigan via Chicago,
agreed to come along for the ride. In Chicago the
pair find themselves in the lobby of the Hotel
Sherman with the year-end coin-op manufacturers
convention going on. The Sherman was the site of
this event for many years. After viewing many coin-
op items, the pair came across the Chester-Pollard
Football Game. After planning a few nickels the
company rep. Donovan shows up. He begins dis-
cussion on how their operation works. You see,
Chester-Pollard doesn't sell games. They lease them
for the life of the game patents (17 years). The lease
deal also allowed you to lock up your territory (in
this case Minnesota and N. Dakota) with the pur-
chases of 75 games. At $450 a game we're talking
about #37 ,500, which was real money back then.
Talk of this kind of money made an impression on
Al Walzer. He was 25 years old and still living at
home, working for his father in his auto parts store.
An agreement was made for donovan to travel to
Minneapolis to meet the principals of the new busi-
ness. Walzer said his goodbyes, traveling on to
Michigan, all the while thinking about sports games
and how maybe he could come up with something
like that football game.
At the same time, Chester-Pollard was developing a
golf game. They even noted it on the marquee of
their Football Game, mentioning future Hockey and
Golf games. But were they really working on a
game? Supposedly they'd been working on the idea
since mid 1926, but by mid 1927 there was still no
game. Popular Games incorporated in June of 1927.
It seems the word got out to Chester-Pollard which
spurred them on. But Chester-Pollard went for a dif-
ferent style game than their football game this time,
and made a small cabinet game. By August 23rd,
Popular Games had the first ten Hoot Mon golf
games done and Walzer went out and stared placing
them in the best Minneapolis hotels, replacing the
Chester-Pollard Footballs. When Chester-Pollard
learned about this they realized they were caught
flatfooted . They had no large cabinet game, and
their small game wasn't ready yet. So what to do?
Spy on the competition! In early September 1927,
Tom Townsend, a Chester-Pollard employee visited
Popular Games to inquire about this new golf game.
28

Download Page 27: PDF File | Image

Download Page 28 PDF File | Image

Future scanning projects are planned by the International Arcade Museum Library (IAML).

Pro Tip: You can flip pages on the issue easily by using the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.